RPIDX vs. SUBFX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund (RPIDX) and Carillon Reams Unconstrained Bond Fund (SUBFX).
RPIDX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jan 10, 2019. SUBFX is managed by Carillon Family of Funds. It was launched on Sep 28, 2011.
Performance
RPIDX vs. SUBFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RPIDX vs. SUBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPIDX T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund | 0.63% | 13.01% | 7.39% | 4.72% | -0.76% | 6.21% | 2.71% | 6.87% |
SUBFX Carillon Reams Unconstrained Bond Fund | 0.65% | 10.61% | 4.22% | 8.53% | -4.74% | -0.32% | 11.18% | 6.15% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RPIDX having a 0.63% return and SUBFX slightly higher at 0.65%.
RPIDX
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -0.80%
- YTD
- 0.63%
- 6M
- 2.98%
- 1Y
- 10.90%
- 3Y*
- 7.98%
- 5Y*
- 4.92%
- 10Y*
- —
SUBFX
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -1.02%
- YTD
- 0.65%
- 6M
- 1.59%
- 1Y
- 7.17%
- 3Y*
- 6.40%
- 5Y*
- 3.58%
- 10Y*
- 4.06%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RPIDX vs. SUBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RPIDX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than SUBFX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RPIDX vs. SUBFX — Risk / Return Rank
RPIDX
SUBFX
RPIDX vs. SUBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund (RPIDX) and Carillon Reams Unconstrained Bond Fund (SUBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RPIDX | SUBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.82 | 2.10 | +0.72 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.88 | 3.15 | +1.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.69 | 1.42 | +0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.09 | 3.61 | +0.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.02 | 13.88 | +3.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RPIDX | SUBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.82 | 2.10 | +0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.28 | 0.66 | +0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.16 | 0.96 | +0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between RPIDX and SUBFX is -0.03. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
RPIDX vs. SUBFX - Dividend Comparison
RPIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.78%, more than SUBFX's 5.88% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPIDX T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund | 12.78% | 12.85% | 6.87% | 6.64% | 7.97% | 5.34% | 7.14% | 4.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SUBFX Carillon Reams Unconstrained Bond Fund | 5.88% | 6.44% | 4.92% | 4.52% | 2.16% | 1.96% | 3.01% | 2.83% | 2.06% | 1.17% | 1.01% | 0.52% |
Drawdowns
RPIDX vs. SUBFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RPIDX drawdown since its inception was -19.95%, which is greater than SUBFX's maximum drawdown of -11.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPIDX and SUBFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RPIDX | SUBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.95% | -11.22% | -8.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.81% | -2.11% | -0.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.31% | -11.17% | +3.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -11.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.14% | -1.17% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.89% | -1.47% | -0.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.67% | 0.55% | +0.12% |
Volatility
RPIDX vs. SUBFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund (RPIDX) is 0.94%, while Carillon Reams Unconstrained Bond Fund (SUBFX) has a volatility of 1.61%. This indicates that RPIDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SUBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RPIDX | SUBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.94% | 1.61% | -0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.67% | 2.20% | +0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.91% | 3.56% | +0.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.86% | 5.43% | -1.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.84% | 5.26% | -0.42% |