RPICX vs. LIAGX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RPICX (T. Rowe Price Institutional International Disciplined Equity Fund) and LIAGX (Lord Abbett International Growth Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RPICX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for LIAGX.

Performance

RPICX vs. LIAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Institutional International Disciplined Equity Fund (RPICX) and Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

RPICX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LIAGX

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: 10.36%
• YTD: 33.43%
• 6M: 33.43%
• 1Y: 47.63%
• 3Y*: 23.58%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPICX vs. LIAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
RPICX T. Rowe Price Institutional International Disciplined Equity Fund	0.00%	0.00%	8.78%	17.23%	-10.26%	-3.05%
LIAGX Lord Abbett International Growth Fund	33.43%	25.09%	9.43%	15.73%	-26.63%	0.07%

Correlation

The correlation between RPICX and LIAGX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2021	0.66

The correlation between RPICX and LIAGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (3 years) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RPICX vs. LIAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPICX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LIAGX

LIAGX Risk / Return Rank: 66
LIAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
LIAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
LIAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
LIAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
LIAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPICX vs. LIAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Institutional International Disciplined Equity Fund (RPICX) and Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RPICX	LIAGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.14	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.83	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.39	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.36	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	13.20	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	RPICX	LIAGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-37.87%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.56%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.11%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-37.87%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	0.00%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-13.12%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.70%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RPICX	LIAGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	10.79%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	20.34%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	22.86%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	19.22%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	19.22%	—

RPICX vs. LIAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPICX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than LIAGX's 0.81% expense ratio.

Dividends

RPICX vs. LIAGX - Dividend Comparison

RPICX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LIAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LIAGX Lord Abbett International Growth Fund	0.28%	0.38%	0.48%	0.71%	0.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RPICX T. Rowe Price Institutional International Disciplined Equity Fund	0.00%	0.00%	3.48%	2.79%	0.84%	3.15%	2.70%	3.61%	19.04%	6.08%	1.68%	2.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RPICX and LIAGX in my portfolio?

RPICX and LIAGX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.