RPGAX vs. TRRCX

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

RPGAX (T. Rowe Price Global Allocation Fund) and TRRCX (T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund) are both mutual funds - RPGAX is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while TRRCX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by T. Rowe Price. Over the past 10 years, RPGAX returned 8.21%/yr vs 8.81%/yr for TRRCX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. RPGAX charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for TRRCX.

Performance

RPGAX vs. TRRCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Global Allocation Fund (RPGAX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund (TRRCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RPGAX having a 6.32% return and TRRCX slightly higher at 6.49%. Over the past 10 years, RPGAX has underperformed TRRCX with an annualized return of 8.21%, while TRRCX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.81% annualized return.

RPGAX

• 1D: 1.56%
• 1M: 1.01%
• YTD: 6.32%
• 6M: 6.83%
• 1Y: 16.41%
• 3Y*: 12.71%
• 5Y*: 5.66%
• 10Y*: 8.21%

TRRCX

• 1D: 1.51%
• 1M: 0.92%
• YTD: 6.49%
• 6M: 1.20%
• 1Y: 10.30%
• 3Y*: 11.17%
• 5Y*: 5.03%
• 10Y*: 8.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPGAX vs. TRRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RPGAX T. Rowe Price Global Allocation Fund	6.32%	15.00%	9.65%	13.78%	-14.54%	9.17%	14.80%	20.37%	-6.89%	15.92%
TRRCX T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund	6.49%	8.23%	10.73%	16.36%	-16.89%	13.70%	15.90%	22.50%	-6.36%	19.46%

Correlation

The correlation between RPGAX and TRRCX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014	0.97

The correlation between RPGAX and TRRCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RPGAX vs. TRRCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPGAX

RPGAX Risk / Return Rank: 62
RPGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
RPGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
RPGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
RPGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
RPGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

TRRCX

TRRCX Risk / Return Rank: 20
TRRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
TRRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
TRRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 25
TRRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
TRRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPGAX vs. TRRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Global Allocation Fund (RPGAX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund (TRRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RPGAX	TRRCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	1.00	+0.92
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.73	1.33	+1.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.21	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.35	1.25	+1.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.09	4.13	+5.96

RPGAX vs. TRRCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPGAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is higher than the TRRCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPGAX and TRRCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RPGAX vs. TRRCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPGAX drawdown since its inception was -24.42%, smaller than the maximum TRRCX drawdown of -52.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPGAX and TRRCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RPGAX	TRRCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.42%	-52.28%	+27.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.75%	-7.93%	+1.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.57%	-10.46%	+0.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.79%	-24.07%	+2.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.42%	-28.55%	+4.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.16%	-1.34%	+0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.83%	-6.07%	+2.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.57%	2.37%	-0.80%

Volatility

RPGAX vs. TRRCX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Global Allocation Fund (RPGAX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund (TRRCX) have volatilities of 3.41% and 3.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RPGAX	TRRCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.41%	3.44%	-0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.95%	8.65%	-1.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.26%	9.93%	-1.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.53%	11.40%	-1.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.26%	12.26%	-2.00%

RPGAX vs. TRRCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPGAX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than TRRCX's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

RPGAX vs. TRRCX - Dividend Comparison

RPGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.61%, while TRRCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RPGAX T. Rowe Price Global Allocation Fund	6.61%	7.03%	5.24%	2.49%	3.15%	7.54%	1.05%	2.97%	2.52%	0.75%	0.36%	1.62%
TRRCX T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund	0.00%	0.00%	3.38%	6.16%	12.05%	9.43%	5.45%	5.44%	8.83%	3.82%	2.66%	3.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RPGAX and TRRCX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, RPGAX and TRRCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, RPGAX or TRRCX?

TRRCX has higher volatility (3.44%) compared to RPGAX (3.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPGAX dropped -24.42% vs TRRCX's -52.28%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RPGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.