RPELX vs. WAVLX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RPELX (T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund) and WAVLX (Wavelength Interest Rate Neutral Fund) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, RPELX returned 3.03%/yr vs 2.88%/yr for WAVLX. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. RPELX charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for WAVLX.

Performance

RPELX vs. WAVLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund (RPELX) and Wavelength Interest Rate Neutral Fund (WAVLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPELX achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly lower than WAVLX's 3.43% return.

RPELX

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: -0.74%
• YTD: 0.19%
• 6M: 0.26%
• 1Y: 4.35%
• 3Y*: 5.83%
• 5Y*: 3.03%
• 10Y*: —

WAVLX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 1.10%
• YTD: 3.43%
• 6M: 3.57%
• 1Y: 10.85%
• 3Y*: 7.86%
• 5Y*: 2.88%
• 10Y*: 4.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPELX vs. WAVLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
RPELX T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund	0.19%	7.13%	7.47%	2.92%	-0.81%	6.37%	2.52%	7.00%
WAVLX Wavelength Interest Rate Neutral Fund	3.43%	9.86%	5.21%	7.02%	-11.34%	1.72%	8.29%	11.23%

Correlation

The correlation between RPELX and WAVLX is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.02
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2019	-0.03

Return for Risk

RPELX vs. WAVLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPELX

RPELX Risk / Return Rank: 41
RPELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
RPELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
RPELX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
RPELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
RPELX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

WAVLX

WAVLX Risk / Return Rank: 80
WAVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
WAVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
WAVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
WAVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
WAVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPELX vs. WAVLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund (RPELX) and Wavelength Interest Rate Neutral Fund (WAVLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RPELX	WAVLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.41	2.61	-1.20
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.59	3.85	-1.26
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.52	-0.21
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.24	3.64	-0.40
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.70	15.83	-7.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RPELX vs. WAVLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPELX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the WAVLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPELX and WAVLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RPELX	WAVLX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.41	2.61	-1.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81	0.52	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.80	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.93	0.65	+0.28

Drawdowns

RPELX vs. WAVLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPELX drawdown since its inception was -19.94%, which is greater than WAVLX's maximum drawdown of -14.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPELX and WAVLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RPELX	WAVLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.94%	-14.39%	-5.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.38%	-3.03%	+1.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.16%	-5.33%	+2.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-7.25%	-14.39%	+7.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-14.39%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.85%	0.00%	-0.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.96%	-2.98%	+1.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.51%	0.69%	-0.18%

Volatility

RPELX vs. WAVLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund (RPELX) is 0.74%, while Wavelength Interest Rate Neutral Fund (WAVLX) has a volatility of 1.41%. This indicates that RPELX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WAVLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RPELX	WAVLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.74%	1.41%	-0.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.58%	3.17%	-0.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.18%	4.23%	-1.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.76%	5.58%	-1.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.74%	5.30%	-0.56%

RPELX vs. WAVLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPELX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than WAVLX's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

RPELX vs. WAVLX - Dividend Comparison

RPELX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.44%, more than WAVLX's 4.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RPELX T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund	7.44%	7.49%	6.95%	4.90%	8.05%	5.39%	7.16%	4.43%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WAVLX Wavelength Interest Rate Neutral Fund	4.32%	3.67%	4.41%	4.83%	3.63%	2.83%	2.21%	4.96%	2.65%	2.09%	2.13%	2.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RPELX and WAVLX in my portfolio?

RPELX and WAVLX have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RPELX or WAVLX?

WAVLX has higher volatility (1.41%) compared to RPELX (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPELX dropped -19.94% vs WAVLX's -14.39%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WAVLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.