RPELX vs. TUIFX
RPELX (T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund) and TUIFX (Toews Unconstrained Income Fund) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, RPELX returned 3.03%/yr vs 1.38%/yr for TUIFX. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RPELX charges 0.56%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for TUIFX.
Performance
RPELX vs. TUIFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RPELX achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly lower than TUIFX's 0.38% return.
RPELX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -0.74%
- YTD
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 0.26%
- 1Y
- 4.35%
- 3Y*
- 5.83%
- 5Y*
- 3.03%
- 10Y*
- —
TUIFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 0.38%
- 6M
- 0.48%
- 1Y
- 3.43%
- 3Y*
- 4.03%
- 5Y*
- 1.38%
- 10Y*
- 1.80%
RPELX vs. TUIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPELX T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund | 0.19% | 7.13% | 7.47% | 2.92% | -0.81% | 6.37% | 2.52% | 7.00% |
TUIFX Toews Unconstrained Income Fund | 0.38% | 3.55% | 4.53% | 3.08% | -4.36% | -0.20% | 2.58% | 6.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between RPELX and TUIFX is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2019 | 0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RPELX vs. TUIFX — Risk / Return Rank
RPELX
TUIFX
RPELX vs. TUIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund (RPELX) and Toews Unconstrained Income Fund (TUIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RPELX | TUIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.34 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | 4.09 | -0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.70 | 9.69 | -0.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RPELX | TUIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.41 | 1.73 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 0.53 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.93 | 0.76 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
RPELX vs. TUIFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RPELX drawdown since its inception was -19.94%, which is greater than TUIFX's maximum drawdown of -7.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPELX and TUIFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RPELX | TUIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.94% | -7.37% | -12.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.38% | -0.87% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.16% | -1.64% | -1.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.25% | -7.37% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -7.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.85% | -0.48% | -0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.96% | -2.07% | +0.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.51% | 0.37% | +0.14% |
Volatility
RPELX vs. TUIFX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund (RPELX) has a higher volatility of 0.74% compared to Toews Unconstrained Income Fund (TUIFX) at 0.68%. This indicates that RPELX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TUIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RPELX | TUIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.74% | 0.68% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.58% | 1.31% | +1.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.18% | 2.06% | +1.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.76% | 2.63% | +1.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.74% | 2.69% | +2.05% |
RPELX vs. TUIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RPELX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than TUIFX's 1.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
RPELX vs. TUIFX - Dividend Comparison
RPELX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.44%, more than TUIFX's 3.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPELX T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund | 7.44% | 7.49% | 6.95% | 4.90% | 8.05% | 5.39% | 7.16% | 4.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TUIFX Toews Unconstrained Income Fund | 3.97% | 4.17% | 4.68% | 4.09% | 1.05% | 2.13% | 1.33% | 2.44% | 2.05% | 4.34% | 2.29% | 1.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RPELX and TUIFX have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RPELX has higher volatility (0.74%) compared to TUIFX (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPELX dropped -19.94% vs TUIFX's -7.37%.
TUIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RPELX and TUIFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer