RPELX vs. PRNHX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RPELX (T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund) and PRNHX (T. Rowe Price New Horizons Fund) are both mutual funds - RPELX is a Nontraditional Bonds fund managed by T. Rowe Price, while PRNHX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by T. Rowe Price. Over the past 5 years, RPELX returned 3.03%/yr vs 1.80%/yr for PRNHX. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RPELX charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PRNHX.

Performance

RPELX vs. PRNHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund (RPELX) and T. Rowe Price New Horizons Fund (PRNHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPELX achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly lower than PRNHX's 15.06% return.

RPELX

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: -0.74%
• YTD: 0.19%
• 6M: 0.26%
• 1Y: 4.35%
• 3Y*: 5.83%
• 5Y*: 3.03%
• 10Y*: —

PRNHX

• 1D: 1.21%
• 1M: 5.05%
• YTD: 15.06%
• 6M: 12.99%
• 1Y: 27.38%
• 3Y*: 11.94%
• 5Y*: 1.80%
• 10Y*: 14.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPELX vs. PRNHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
RPELX T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund	0.19%	7.13%	7.47%	2.92%	-0.81%	6.37%	2.52%	7.00%
PRNHX T. Rowe Price New Horizons Fund	15.06%	3.27%	8.80%	21.35%	-36.96%	9.96%	58.05%	48.00%

Correlation

The correlation between RPELX and PRNHX is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.04
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2019	0.01

The correlation between RPELX and PRNHX shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.04 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RPELX vs. PRNHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPELX

RPELX Risk / Return Rank: 41
RPELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
RPELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
RPELX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
RPELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
RPELX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

PRNHX

PRNHX Risk / Return Rank: 30
PRNHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
PRNHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
PRNHX Omega Ratio Rank: 25
PRNHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
PRNHX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPELX vs. PRNHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund (RPELX) and T. Rowe Price New Horizons Fund (PRNHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RPELX	PRNHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.41	1.49	-0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.59	2.10	+0.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.26	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.24	2.22	+1.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.70	8.57	+0.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RPELX vs. PRNHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPELX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the PRNHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPELX and PRNHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RPELX	PRNHX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.41	1.49	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81	0.07	+0.74
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.65	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.93	0.49	+0.44

Drawdowns

RPELX vs. PRNHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPELX drawdown since its inception was -19.94%, smaller than the maximum PRNHX drawdown of -70.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPELX and PRNHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RPELX	PRNHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.94%	-70.96%	+51.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.38%	-13.12%	+11.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.16%	-26.65%	+23.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-7.25%	-48.37%	+41.12%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-48.37%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.85%	-11.36%	+10.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.96%	-18.38%	+16.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.51%	3.39%	-2.88%

Volatility

RPELX vs. PRNHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund (RPELX) is 0.74%, while T. Rowe Price New Horizons Fund (PRNHX) has a volatility of 6.75%. This indicates that RPELX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRNHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RPELX	PRNHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.74%	6.75%	-6.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.58%	15.55%	-12.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.18%	19.51%	-16.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.76%	24.58%	-20.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.74%	22.83%	-18.09%

RPELX vs. PRNHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPELX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than PRNHX's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

RPELX vs. PRNHX - Dividend Comparison

RPELX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.44%, less than PRNHX's 10.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PRNHX T. Rowe Price New Horizons Fund	10.30%	11.85%	9.82%	0.00%	4.72%	17.09%	13.67%	23.46%	13.94%	8.27%	5.77%	7.72%
RPELX T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund	7.44%	7.49%	6.95%	4.90%	8.05%	5.39%	7.16%	4.43%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RPELX and PRNHX in my portfolio?

RPELX and PRNHX have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RPELX or PRNHX?

PRNHX has higher volatility (6.75%) compared to RPELX (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPELX dropped -19.94% vs PRNHX's -70.96%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PRNHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.