PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROLL.L vs. WCOB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROLL.L vs. WCOB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ROLL.L) and WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF USD Acc (WCOB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ROLL.L is traded in USD, while WCOB.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the WCOB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROLL.L achieves a 23.85% return, which is significantly lower than WCOB.L's 25.62% return.


ROLL.L

1D
0.55%
1M
1.79%
6M
17.06%
YTD
23.85%
1Y
34.95%
3Y*
14.61%
5Y*
12.62%
10Y*

WCOB.L

1D
0.41%
1M
1.16%
6M
18.34%
YTD
25.62%
1Y
36.24%
3Y*
13.17%
5Y*
10.68%
10Y*
7.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROLL.L vs. WCOB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ROLL.L
iShares Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Swap UCITS ETF
23.85%16.94%4.68%-2.22%16.67%27.69%0.83%5.26%-11.11%
WCOB.L
WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF USD Acc
25.62%15.86%2.76%-7.43%12.94%27.19%0.87%7.46%-9.63%

Correlation

The correlation between ROLL.L and WCOB.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2018

0.84

The correlation between ROLL.L and WCOB.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROLL.L vs. WCOB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROLL.L
ROLL.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ROLL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROLL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROLL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
ROLL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROLL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

WCOB.L
WCOB.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
WCOB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WCOB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
WCOB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
WCOB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
WCOB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROLL.L vs. WCOB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ROLL.L) and WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF USD Acc (WCOB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ROLL.LWCOB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.36

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

2.59

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.63

8.97

-0.34

ROLL.L vs. WCOB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROLL.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the WCOB.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROLL.L and WCOB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ROLL.L vs. WCOB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROLL.L drawdown since its inception was -26.90%, smaller than the maximum WCOB.L drawdown of -44.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROLL.L and WCOB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROLL.LWCOB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.90%

-44.63%

+17.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.94%

-13.92%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.94%

-23.60%

+9.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.45%

-24.44%

+3.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.46%

-7.89%

+0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.17%

-21.75%

+12.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.04%

4.03%

+0.01%

Volatility

ROLL.L vs. WCOB.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ROLL.L) is 4.60%, while WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF USD Acc (WCOB.L) has a volatility of 5.18%. This indicates that ROLL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WCOB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROLL.LWCOB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.60%

5.18%

-0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.48%

15.51%

-1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.55%

17.37%

-0.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.16%

20.70%

-4.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.96%

16.67%

-1.71%

ROLL.L vs. WCOB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROLL.L has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than WCOB.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

ROLL.L vs. WCOB.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ROLL.L nor WCOB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, ROLL.L and WCOB.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, ROLL.L is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ROLL.L is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for WCOB.L.

ROLL.L tracks iShares Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Swap UCITS ETF, while WCOB.L tracks Optimised Roll Commodity. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for ROLL.L and 0.35% for WCOB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROLL.L and WCOB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer