ROLL.L vs. IITU.L
ROLL.L (iShares Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) and IITU.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - ROLL.L is a Commodities fund tracking the iShares Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Swap UCITS ETF, while IITU.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ROLL.L returned 12.62%/yr vs 21.16%/yr for IITU.L. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ROLL.L charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IITU.L.
Performance
ROLL.L vs. IITU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ROLL.L is traded in USD, while IITU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IITU.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROLL.L achieves a 23.85% return, which is significantly higher than IITU.L's 17.45% return.
ROLL.L
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 1.79%
- 6M
- 17.06%
- YTD
- 23.85%
- 1Y
- 34.95%
- 3Y*
- 14.61%
- 5Y*
- 12.62%
- 10Y*
- —
IITU.L
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -2.54%
- 6M
- 20.12%
- YTD
- 17.45%
- 1Y
- 32.12%
- 3Y*
- 29.51%
- 5Y*
- 21.16%
- 10Y*
- 25.60%
ROLL.L vs. IITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROLL.L iShares Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 23.85% | 16.94% | 4.68% | -2.22% | 16.67% | 27.69% | 0.83% | 5.26% | -11.11% |
IITU.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 17.45% | 23.07% | 38.50% | 58.65% | -29.11% | 34.44% | 42.58% | 49.99% | -18.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROLL.L and IITU.L is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2018 | 0.20 |
The correlation between ROLL.L and IITU.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROLL.L vs. IITU.L — Risk / Return Rank
ROLL.L
IITU.L
ROLL.L vs. IITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ROLL.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ROLL.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.25 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | 1.90 | +0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.63 | 5.17 | +3.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ROLL.L vs. IITU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROLL.L drawdown since its inception was -26.90%, smaller than the maximum IITU.L drawdown of -43.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROLL.L and IITU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROLL.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.90% | -43.85% | +16.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.94% | -16.80% | +2.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.94% | -26.42% | +12.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.45% | -34.22% | +13.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.46% | -7.53% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.17% | -10.59% | +1.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.04% | 6.20% | -2.16% |
Volatility
ROLL.L vs. IITU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ROLL.L) is 4.60%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) has a volatility of 7.45%. This indicates that ROLL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IITU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROLL.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.60% | 7.45% | -2.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.48% | 17.21% | -2.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.55% | 21.89% | -5.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.16% | 27.39% | -11.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.96% | 24.22% | -9.26% |
ROLL.L vs. IITU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROLL.L has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than IITU.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROLL.L vs. IITU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ROLL.L nor IITU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ROLL.L and IITU.L have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IITU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IITU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for ROLL.L.
ROLL.L is categorized as Commodities, while IITU.L is Technology Equities. ROLL.L tracks iShares Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Swap UCITS ETF, while IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for ROLL.L and 0.15% for IITU.L.
Find the right allocation for ROLL.L and IITU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer