ROLG.L vs. WXAG.L
ROLG.L (iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Swap UCITS ETF USD) and WXAG.L (WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both Commodities funds - ROLG.L tracks the Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity while WXAG.L tracks the Morgan Stanley RADAR ex Agriculture & Livestock Commodity. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ROLG.L returned 14.24%/yr vs 17.72%/yr for WXAG.L. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ROLG.L charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for WXAG.L.
Performance
ROLG.L vs. WXAG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ROLG.L is traded in GBP, while WXAG.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WXAG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ROLG.L having a 27.75% return and WXAG.L slightly higher at 28.79%.
ROLG.L
- 1D
- -1.64%
- 1M
- -1.90%
- YTD
- 27.75%
- 6M
- 27.51%
- 1Y
- 44.31%
- 3Y*
- 14.24%
- 5Y*
- 14.55%
- 10Y*
- —
WXAG.L
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- -2.15%
- YTD
- 28.79%
- 6M
- 34.19%
- 1Y
- 64.61%
- 3Y*
- 17.72%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ROLG.L vs. WXAG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROLG.L iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Swap UCITS ETF USD | 27.75% | 8.64% | 6.25% | -7.36% | 30.51% | -1.82% |
WXAG.L WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF USD Acc | 28.79% | 23.09% | 4.71% | -12.62% | 30.48% | -3.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROLG.L and WXAG.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2021 | 0.68 |
The correlation between ROLG.L and WXAG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (all time) to 0.81 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROLG.L vs. WXAG.L — Risk / Return Rank
ROLG.L
WXAG.L
ROLG.L vs. WXAG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Swap UCITS ETF USD (ROLG.L) and WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF USD Acc (WXAG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ROLG.L | WXAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.49 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.47 | 5.64 | +0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.28 | 19.68 | -1.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ROLG.L | WXAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.65 | 2.87 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.75 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
ROLG.L vs. WXAG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROLG.L drawdown since its inception was -22.66%, smaller than the maximum WXAG.L drawdown of -23.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROLG.L and WXAG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROLG.L | WXAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.66% | -23.95% | +1.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.81% | -11.39% | +4.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.27% | -15.24% | +1.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.56% | -5.60% | +1.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.98% | -13.47% | +4.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.42% | 3.27% | -0.85% |
Volatility
ROLG.L vs. WXAG.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Swap UCITS ETF USD (ROLG.L) has a higher volatility of 5.90% compared to WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF USD Acc (WXAG.L) at 4.88%. This indicates that ROLG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WXAG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROLG.L | WXAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.90% | 4.88% | +1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.98% | 19.26% | -5.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.69% | 22.37% | -5.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.69% | 21.71% | -4.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 21.71% | -4.73% |
ROLG.L vs. WXAG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROLG.L has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than WXAG.L's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROLG.L vs. WXAG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ROLG.L nor WXAG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ROLG.L and WXAG.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ROLG.L is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ROLG.L is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for WXAG.L.
ROLG.L tracks Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity, while WXAG.L tracks Morgan Stanley RADAR ex Agriculture & Livestock Commodity. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for ROLG.L and 0.60% for WXAG.L.
Find the right allocation for ROLG.L and WXAG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer