ROLG.L vs. WLDS.L
ROLG.L (iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Swap UCITS ETF USD) and WLDS.L (iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ROLG.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity, while WLDS.L is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Small Cap Inde. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ROLG.L returned 12.75%/yr vs 8.12%/yr for WLDS.L. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ROLG.L charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for WLDS.L.
Performance
ROLG.L vs. WLDS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROLG.L achieves a 17.97% return, which is significantly higher than WLDS.L's 16.89% return.
ROLG.L
- 1D
- -1.69%
- 1M
- -9.69%
- YTD
- 17.97%
- 6M
- 16.69%
- 1Y
- 31.76%
- 3Y*
- 11.75%
- 5Y*
- 12.75%
- 10Y*
- —
WLDS.L
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 4.37%
- YTD
- 16.89%
- 6M
- 16.37%
- 1Y
- 34.41%
- 3Y*
- 16.66%
- 5Y*
- 8.12%
- 10Y*
- —
ROLG.L vs. WLDS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROLG.L iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Swap UCITS ETF USD | 17.97% | 8.66% | 6.32% | -7.36% | 30.51% | 29.23% | -2.41% | 1.84% | -30.50% |
WLDS.L iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF | 16.89% | 11.75% | 8.63% | 11.26% | -8.89% | 16.71% | 12.54% | 20.41% | -14.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROLG.L and WLDS.L is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2018 | 0.23 |
The correlation between ROLG.L and WLDS.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROLG.L vs. WLDS.L — Risk / Return Rank
ROLG.L
WLDS.L
ROLG.L vs. WLDS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Swap UCITS ETF USD (ROLG.L) and iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WLDS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ROLG.L | WLDS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.48 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 4.36 | -1.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.91 | 16.45 | -4.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ROLG.L vs. WLDS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROLG.L drawdown since its inception was -40.64%, smaller than the maximum WLDS.L drawdown of -43.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROLG.L and WLDS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROLG.L | WLDS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.64% | -43.18% | +2.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.80% | -7.86% | -3.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.00% | -21.53% | -3.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.00% | -21.53% | -3.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.80% | -0.25% | -11.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.42% | -12.24% | -6.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.66% | 2.09% | +0.57% |
Volatility
ROLG.L vs. WLDS.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Swap UCITS ETF USD (ROLG.L) has a higher volatility of 4.71% compared to iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WLDS.L) at 3.49%. This indicates that ROLG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WLDS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROLG.L | WLDS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.71% | 3.49% | +1.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.49% | 9.74% | +4.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.92% | 12.84% | +4.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.19% | 20.31% | +1.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.68% | 22.42% | -0.74% |
ROLG.L vs. WLDS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROLG.L has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than WLDS.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROLG.L vs. WLDS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ROLG.L nor WLDS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ROLG.L and WLDS.L have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ROLG.L is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ROLG.L is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for WLDS.L.
ROLG.L is categorized as Commodities, while WLDS.L is Small Cap Blend Equities. ROLG.L tracks Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity, while WLDS.L tracks MSCI World Small Cap Inde. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for ROLG.L and 0.35% for WLDS.L.
Find the right allocation for ROLG.L and WLDS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer