ROLG.L vs. FAIG.L
ROLG.L (iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Swap UCITS ETF USD) and FAIG.L (WisdomTree Broad Commodities Longer Dated) are both Commodities funds - ROLG.L tracks the Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity while FAIG.L tracks the Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ROLG.L returned 14.55%/yr vs 11.97%/yr for FAIG.L. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ROLG.L charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for FAIG.L.
Performance
ROLG.L vs. FAIG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ROLG.L is traded in GBP, while FAIG.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FAIG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROLG.L achieves a 27.75% return, which is significantly higher than FAIG.L's 19.75% return.
ROLG.L
- 1D
- -1.64%
- 1M
- -1.90%
- YTD
- 27.75%
- 6M
- 27.51%
- 1Y
- 44.31%
- 3Y*
- 14.24%
- 5Y*
- 14.55%
- 10Y*
- —
FAIG.L
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- -1.57%
- YTD
- 19.75%
- 6M
- 18.96%
- 1Y
- 32.79%
- 3Y*
- 10.60%
- 5Y*
- 11.97%
- 10Y*
- 8.21%
ROLG.L vs. FAIG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROLG.L iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Swap UCITS ETF USD | 27.75% | 8.64% | 6.25% | -7.36% | 30.51% | 29.23% | -2.41% | 1.84% | -9.45% |
FAIG.L WisdomTree Broad Commodities Longer Dated | 19.75% | 7.66% | 5.90% | -11.88% | 29.81% | 31.66% | -0.96% | 2.48% | -8.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROLG.L and FAIG.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2018 | 0.82 |
The correlation between ROLG.L and FAIG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROLG.L vs. FAIG.L — Risk / Return Rank
ROLG.L
FAIG.L
ROLG.L vs. FAIG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Swap UCITS ETF USD (ROLG.L) and WisdomTree Broad Commodities Longer Dated (FAIG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ROLG.L | FAIG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.40 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.47 | 4.90 | +1.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.28 | 12.88 | +5.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ROLG.L | FAIG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.65 | 2.19 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.76 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.23 | +0.35 |
Drawdowns
ROLG.L vs. FAIG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROLG.L drawdown since its inception was -22.66%, smaller than the maximum FAIG.L drawdown of -51.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROLG.L and FAIG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROLG.L | FAIG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.66% | -51.32% | +28.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.81% | -6.66% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.27% | -12.87% | -0.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.85% | -26.47% | +6.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.56% | -3.81% | -0.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.98% | -26.24% | +17.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.42% | 2.54% | -0.12% |
Volatility
ROLG.L vs. FAIG.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Swap UCITS ETF USD (ROLG.L) has a higher volatility of 5.90% compared to WisdomTree Broad Commodities Longer Dated (FAIG.L) at 4.60%. This indicates that ROLG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAIG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROLG.L | FAIG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.90% | 4.60% | +1.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.98% | 12.16% | +1.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.69% | 14.96% | +1.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.69% | 15.73% | +1.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 14.71% | +2.27% |
ROLG.L vs. FAIG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROLG.L has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than FAIG.L's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROLG.L vs. FAIG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ROLG.L nor FAIG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, ROLG.L and FAIG.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, ROLG.L is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ROLG.L is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for FAIG.L.
ROLG.L tracks Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity, while FAIG.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for ROLG.L and 0.49% for FAIG.L.
Find the right allocation for ROLG.L and FAIG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer