ROCQ vs. QCJL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ROCQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF) and QCJL (FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - July) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ROCQ charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for QCJL.

Performance

ROCQ vs. QCJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF (ROCQ) and FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - July (QCJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ROCQ

• 1D: -2.77%
• 1M: -0.19%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QCJL

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 5.21%
• 6M: 5.12%
• 1Y: 13.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROCQ vs. QCJL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ROCQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF	15.38%
QCJL FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - July	5.50%

Correlation

The correlation between ROCQ and QCJL is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026	0.86

Return for Risk

ROCQ vs. QCJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROCQ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QCJL

QCJL Risk / Return Rank: 84
QCJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
QCJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
QCJL Omega Ratio Rank: 87
QCJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
QCJL Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROCQ vs. QCJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF (ROCQ) and FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - July (QCJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ROCQ	QCJL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.42	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.52	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.49	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.40	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	17.38	—

Drawdowns

ROCQ vs. QCJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROCQ drawdown since its inception was -5.68%, smaller than the maximum QCJL drawdown of -11.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROCQ and QCJL.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROCQ	QCJL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.68%	-11.18%	+5.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.77%	-0.18%	-2.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.97%	-1.04%	+0.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.78%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ROCQ	QCJL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.73%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.22%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.58%	5.67%	+13.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.58%	9.35%	+10.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.58%	9.35%	+10.23%

ROCQ vs. QCJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROCQ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than QCJL's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

ROCQ vs. QCJL - Dividend Comparison

ROCQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, while QCJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM
QCJL FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - July	0.00%
ROCQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF	2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ROCQ and QCJL in my portfolio?

ROCQ and QCJL have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ROCQ or QCJL?

On fees, ROCQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ROCQ or QCJL?

ROCQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for QCJL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ROCQ or QCJL?

ROCQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.07%, compared with 0.00% for QCJL.

What is the main difference between ROCQ and QCJL?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for ROCQ and 0.90% for QCJL.