ROCQ vs. PQAP

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

ROCQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF) and PQAP (PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April) are both exchange-traded funds - ROCQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while PQAP is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by PGIM. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ROCQ charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PQAP.

Performance

ROCQ vs. PQAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF (ROCQ) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ROCQ

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: -1.59%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

PQAP

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 0.05%
• 6M: 10.55%
• YTD: 11.16%
• 1Y: 17.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PQAP PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April	$40.20K	$92.99K	$132.77K
ROCQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF	$13.25M	$10.81M	$11.79M

ROCQ vs. PQAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ROCQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF	13.59%
PQAP PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April	9.64%

Correlation

The correlation between ROCQ and PQAP is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026	0.93

Return for Risk

ROCQ vs. PQAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ROCQ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PQAP

PQAP Risk / Return Rank: 96
PQAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
PQAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
PQAP Omega Ratio Rank: 96
PQAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
PQAP Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ROCQ vs. PQAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF (ROCQ) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ROCQ	PQAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.98	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	4.58	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.65	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	6.45	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	32.16	—

Drawdowns

ROCQ vs. PQAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROCQ drawdown since its inception was -8.05%, smaller than the maximum PQAP drawdown of -10.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROCQ and PQAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROCQ	PQAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.05%	-10.79%	+2.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.27%	-0.95%	-3.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.57%	-0.64%	-0.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.51%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ROCQ	PQAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.36%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.66%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.01%	5.46%	+14.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.01%	10.82%	+9.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.01%	10.82%	+9.19%

ROCQ vs. PQAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROCQ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PQAP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

ROCQ vs. PQAP - Dividend Comparison

ROCQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, more than PQAP's 0.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
PQAP PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April	0.02%	0.02%
ROCQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF	3.08%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ROCQ and PQAP in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, ROCQ and PQAP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, ROCQ or PQAP?

On fees, ROCQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ROCQ or PQAP?

ROCQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PQAP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ROCQ or PQAP?

ROCQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.08%, compared with 0.02% for PQAP.

What is the main difference between ROCQ and PQAP?

ROCQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while PQAP is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for ROCQ and 0.50% for PQAP.