ROCQ vs. LQTI
Compare and contrast key facts about JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF (ROCQ) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI).
ROCQ and LQTI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ROCQ is an actively managed fund by JPMorgan. It was launched on Mar 18, 2026. LQTI is an actively managed fund by FT Vest. It was launched on Feb 11, 2025.
Performance
ROCQ vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ROCQ vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ROCQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF | -1.05% |
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 0.07% |
Returns By Period
ROCQ
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQTI
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -1.73%
- YTD
- -0.44%
- 6M
- -0.03%
- 1Y
- 4.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ROCQ vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROCQ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ROCQ vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank
ROCQ
LQTI
ROCQ vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF (ROCQ) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ROCQ | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.95 | 0.90 | -1.86 |
Correlation
The correlation between ROCQ and LQTI is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ROCQ vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison
ROCQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LQTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.07%.
| TTM | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ROCQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 9.07% | 7.01% |
Drawdowns
ROCQ vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROCQ drawdown since its inception was -5.15%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROCQ and LQTI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROCQ | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.15% | -3.41% | -1.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | -2.03% | +0.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.16% | -0.78% | -1.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.12% | — |
Volatility
ROCQ vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ROCQ | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.66% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.87% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.51% | 6.23% | +22.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.51% | 6.11% | +22.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.51% | 6.11% | +22.40% |