ROBO.L vs. XLKS.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

ROBO.L (L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF) and XLKS.L (Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc) are both Technology Equities funds - ROBO.L tracks the L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF while XLKS.L tracks the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ROBO.L returned 12.58%/yr vs 25.36%/yr for XLKS.L. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ROBO.L charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLKS.L.

Performance

ROBO.L vs. XLKS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBO.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROBO.L achieves a 15.43% return, which is significantly lower than XLKS.L's 17.68% return. Over the past 10 years, ROBO.L has underperformed XLKS.L with an annualized return of 12.58%, while XLKS.L has yielded a comparatively higher 25.36% annualized return.

ROBO.L

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: -5.90%
• 6M: 9.24%
• YTD: 15.43%
• 1Y: 33.11%
• 3Y*: 11.17%
• 5Y*: 4.93%
• 10Y*: 12.58%

XLKS.L

• 1D: -0.94%
• 1M: -2.87%
• 6M: 20.28%
• YTD: 17.68%
• 1Y: 32.56%
• 3Y*: 31.32%
• 5Y*: 22.18%
• 10Y*: 25.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROBO.L vs. XLKS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ROBO.L L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF	15.43%	23.22%	-1.60%	25.20%	-33.80%	15.65%	45.75%	29.35%	-21.17%	46.40%
XLKS.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc	17.68%	24.23%	41.72%	60.64%	-29.12%	34.73%	42.78%	48.83%	-2.51%	33.27%

Correlation

The correlation between ROBO.L and XLKS.L is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2014	0.76

The correlation between ROBO.L and XLKS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ROBO.L vs. XLKS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROBO.L

ROBO.L Risk / Return Rank: 46
ROBO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
ROBO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
ROBO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 42
ROBO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
ROBO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 50

XLKS.L

XLKS.L Risk / Return Rank: 48
XLKS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
XLKS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
XLKS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 49
XLKS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
XLKS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROBO.L vs. XLKS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBO.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ROBO.L	XLKS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.28	1.48	-0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.87	2.09	-0.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.25	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.06	1.91	+0.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.79	5.17	+1.62

ROBO.L vs. XLKS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROBO.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the XLKS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROBO.L and XLKS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ROBO.L vs. XLKS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROBO.L drawdown since its inception was -42.74%, which is greater than XLKS.L's maximum drawdown of -34.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBO.L and XLKS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROBO.L	XLKS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.74%	-34.26%	-8.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.23%	-16.99%	+0.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.70%	-26.97%	-1.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.74%	-34.26%	-8.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.74%	-34.26%	-8.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.09%	-7.74%	-3.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.17%	-5.14%	-8.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.94%	6.28%	-1.34%

Volatility

ROBO.L vs. XLKS.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBO.L) has a higher volatility of 9.56% compared to Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L) at 7.31%. This indicates that ROBO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLKS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ROBO.L	XLKS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.56%	7.31%	+2.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.02%	17.62%	+4.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.19%	22.00%	+4.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.18%	24.13%	+0.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.43%	22.18%	+0.25%

ROBO.L vs. XLKS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROBO.L has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than XLKS.L's 0.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

ROBO.L vs. XLKS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ROBO.L nor XLKS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ROBO.L and XLKS.L in my portfolio?

ROBO.L and XLKS.L have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ROBO.L or XLKS.L?

On fees, XLKS.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ROBO.L or XLKS.L?

XLKS.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for ROBO.L.

What is the main difference between ROBO.L and XLKS.L?

ROBO.L tracks L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF, while XLKS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: L&G and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for ROBO.L and 0.14% for XLKS.L.