PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROBO.L vs. SMGB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROBO.L vs. SMGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBO.L) and VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ROBO.L is traded in USD, while SMGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SMGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROBO.L achieves a 15.43% return, which is significantly lower than SMGB.L's 77.21% return.


ROBO.L

1D
-0.77%
1M
-5.90%
6M
9.24%
YTD
15.43%
1Y
33.11%
3Y*
11.17%
5Y*
4.93%
10Y*
12.58%

SMGB.L

1D
-3.09%
1M
-8.61%
6M
63.59%
YTD
77.21%
1Y
124.86%
3Y*
54.50%
5Y*
35.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROBO.L vs. SMGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ROBO.L
L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF
15.43%23.22%-1.60%25.20%-33.80%15.65%3.95%
SMGB.L
VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF
77.21%49.26%24.21%74.92%-35.50%43.10%2.03%

Correlation

The correlation between ROBO.L and SMGB.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2020

0.76

The correlation between ROBO.L and SMGB.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROBO.L vs. SMGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROBO.L
ROBO.L Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
ROBO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROBO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROBO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
ROBO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROBO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

SMGB.L
SMGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SMGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
SMGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROBO.L vs. SMGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBO.L) and VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ROBO.LSMGB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.47

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

8.76

-6.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.79

27.77

-20.99

ROBO.L vs. SMGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROBO.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the SMGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROBO.L and SMGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ROBO.L vs. SMGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROBO.L drawdown since its inception was -42.74%, smaller than the maximum SMGB.L drawdown of -45.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBO.L and SMGB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROBO.LSMGB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.74%

-45.92%

+3.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.23%

-14.18%

-2.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.70%

-36.85%

+8.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.74%

-45.92%

+3.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.09%

-11.66%

+0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.17%

-11.21%

-1.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.94%

4.48%

+0.46%

Volatility

ROBO.L vs. SMGB.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBO.L) is 9.56%, while VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMGB.L) has a volatility of 16.49%. This indicates that ROBO.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROBO.LSMGB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.56%

16.49%

-6.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.02%

30.67%

-8.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.19%

36.87%

-10.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.18%

33.17%

-8.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.43%

32.57%

-10.14%

ROBO.L vs. SMGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROBO.L has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than SMGB.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

ROBO.L vs. SMGB.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ROBO.L nor SMGB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ROBO.L and SMGB.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SMGB.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SMGB.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for ROBO.L.

ROBO.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while SMGB.L is Semiconductors. ROBO.L tracks L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF, while SMGB.L tracks MarketVector US Listed Semiconductor 10% Capped Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: L&G and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for ROBO.L and 0.35% for SMGB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROBO.L and SMGB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer