ROBE.L vs. XLKQ.L
ROBE.L (L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF) and XLKQ.L (Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc) are both Technology Equities funds - ROBE.L tracks the L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF while XLKQ.L tracks the S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ROBE.L returned 12.19%/yr vs 24.95%/yr for XLKQ.L. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ROBE.L charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLKQ.L.
Performance
ROBE.L vs. XLKQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ROBE.L is traded in EUR, while XLKQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLKQ.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROBE.L achieves a 18.25% return, which is significantly lower than XLKQ.L's 20.80% return. Over the past 10 years, ROBE.L has underperformed XLKQ.L with an annualized return of 12.19%, while XLKQ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 24.95% annualized return.
ROBE.L
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- -4.91%
- 6M
- 10.91%
- YTD
- 18.25%
- 1Y
- 34.78%
- 3Y*
- 10.32%
- 5Y*
- 5.54%
- 10Y*
- 12.19%
XLKQ.L
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- -1.56%
- 6M
- 22.37%
- YTD
- 20.80%
- 1Y
- 34.38%
- 3Y*
- 30.55%
- 5Y*
- 22.99%
- 10Y*
- 24.95%
ROBE.L vs. XLKQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROBE.L L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF | 18.25% | 9.14% | 4.79% | 20.61% | -29.75% | 25.18% | 33.46% | 31.56% | -17.23% | 28.95% |
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc | 20.80% | 9.72% | 50.98% | 55.05% | -24.67% | 45.15% | 30.44% | 53.56% | 1.28% | 17.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROBE.L and XLKQ.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2014 | 0.75 |
The correlation between ROBE.L and XLKQ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROBE.L vs. XLKQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
ROBE.L
XLKQ.L
ROBE.L vs. XLKQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBE.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ROBE.L | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.27 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | 2.17 | +0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.47 | 5.44 | +3.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ROBE.L vs. XLKQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROBE.L drawdown since its inception was -36.18%, smaller than the maximum XLKQ.L drawdown of -40.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBE.L and XLKQ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROBE.L | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.18% | -40.10% | +3.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.69% | -15.78% | +2.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.61% | -30.46% | -1.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.18% | -30.46% | -5.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.18% | -30.78% | -5.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.89% | -6.20% | -3.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.59% | -8.02% | -3.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.25% | 6.31% | -2.06% |
Volatility
ROBE.L vs. XLKQ.L - Volatility Comparison
L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBE.L) has a higher volatility of 9.94% compared to Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) at 7.30%. This indicates that ROBE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLKQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROBE.L | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.94% | 7.30% | +2.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.85% | 16.47% | +3.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.31% | 21.50% | +2.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.35% | 26.99% | -4.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.43% | 23.92% | -2.49% |
ROBE.L vs. XLKQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROBE.L has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than XLKQ.L's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROBE.L vs. XLKQ.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ROBE.L nor XLKQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ROBE.L and XLKQ.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLKQ.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLKQ.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for ROBE.L.
ROBE.L tracks L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF, while XLKQ.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: L&G and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for ROBE.L and 0.14% for XLKQ.L.
Find the right allocation for ROBE.L and XLKQ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer