PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROBE.L vs. IDTW.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROBE.L vs. IDTW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBE.L) and iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDTW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ROBE.L is traded in EUR, while IDTW.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IDTW.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROBE.L achieves a 18.25% return, which is significantly lower than IDTW.L's 64.64% return. Over the past 10 years, ROBE.L has underperformed IDTW.L with an annualized return of 12.19%, while IDTW.L has yielded a comparatively higher 20.13% annualized return.


ROBE.L

1D
-0.98%
1M
-4.91%
6M
10.91%
YTD
18.25%
1Y
34.78%
3Y*
10.32%
5Y*
5.54%
10Y*
12.19%

IDTW.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-3.78%
6M
55.87%
YTD
64.64%
1Y
89.88%
3Y*
39.27%
5Y*
20.91%
10Y*
20.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROBE.L vs. IDTW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ROBE.L
L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF
18.25%9.14%4.79%20.61%-29.75%25.18%33.46%31.56%-17.23%28.95%
IDTW.L
iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
64.64%16.14%31.77%24.98%-25.18%38.12%23.27%37.48%-4.85%12.32%

Correlation

The correlation between ROBE.L and IDTW.L is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2014

0.66

The correlation between ROBE.L and IDTW.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROBE.L vs. IDTW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROBE.L
ROBE.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
ROBE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROBE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROBE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
ROBE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROBE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

IDTW.L
IDTW.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
IDTW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDTW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDTW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
IDTW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDTW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROBE.L vs. IDTW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBE.L) and iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDTW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ROBE.LIDTW.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.52

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

9.14

-6.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.47

22.77

-14.30

ROBE.L vs. IDTW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROBE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the IDTW.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROBE.L and IDTW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ROBE.L vs. IDTW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROBE.L drawdown since its inception was -36.18%, smaller than the maximum IDTW.L drawdown of -55.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBE.L and IDTW.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROBE.LIDTW.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.18%

-55.44%

+19.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.69%

-9.74%

-3.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.61%

-30.87%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.18%

-32.38%

-3.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.18%

-32.38%

-3.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.89%

-9.74%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.59%

-11.54%

-0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.25%

3.91%

+0.34%

Volatility

ROBE.L vs. IDTW.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBE.L) is 9.94%, while iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDTW.L) has a volatility of 11.33%. This indicates that ROBE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDTW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROBE.LIDTW.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.94%

11.33%

-1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.85%

23.39%

-3.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.31%

27.29%

-2.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.35%

22.84%

-0.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.43%

21.93%

-0.50%

ROBE.L vs. IDTW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROBE.L has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than IDTW.L's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

ROBE.L vs. IDTW.L - Dividend Comparison

ROBE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IDTW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDTW.L
iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.96%1.51%1.43%2.09%3.39%1.35%1.73%2.15%2.78%2.70%3.10%3.33%
ROBE.L
L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROBE.L and IDTW.L have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IDTW.L is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IDTW.L is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for ROBE.L.

ROBE.L tracks L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF, while IDTW.L tracks iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist). They also come from different issuers: L&G and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for ROBE.L and 0.74% for IDTW.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROBE.L and IDTW.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer