PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROBE.L vs. HTWG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROBE.L vs. HTWG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBE.L) and L&G Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF (HTWG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ROBE.L is traded in EUR, while HTWG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the HTWG.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROBE.L achieves a 18.25% return, which is significantly lower than HTWG.L's 34.19% return.


ROBE.L

1D
-0.98%
1M
-4.91%
6M
10.91%
YTD
18.25%
1Y
34.78%
3Y*
10.32%
5Y*
5.54%
10Y*
12.19%

HTWG.L

1D
-1.92%
1M
-8.28%
6M
20.51%
YTD
34.19%
1Y
63.54%
3Y*
13.80%
5Y*
0.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROBE.L vs. HTWG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ROBE.L
L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF
18.25%9.14%4.79%20.61%-29.75%7.08%
HTWG.L
L&G Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF
34.19%23.87%-2.22%-6.56%-33.17%-27.05%

Correlation

The correlation between ROBE.L and HTWG.L is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2021

0.72

The correlation between ROBE.L and HTWG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROBE.L vs. HTWG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROBE.L
ROBE.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
ROBE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROBE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROBE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
ROBE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROBE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

HTWG.L
HTWG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
HTWG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTWG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTWG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
HTWG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTWG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROBE.L vs. HTWG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBE.L) and L&G Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF (HTWG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ROBE.LHTWG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.33

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

3.33

-0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.47

9.00

-0.53

ROBE.L vs. HTWG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROBE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the HTWG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROBE.L and HTWG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ROBE.L vs. HTWG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROBE.L drawdown since its inception was -36.18%, smaller than the maximum HTWG.L drawdown of -64.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBE.L and HTWG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROBE.LHTWG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.18%

-64.30%

+28.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.69%

-19.00%

+5.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.61%

-31.14%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.18%

-57.04%

+20.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.89%

-25.96%

+16.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.59%

-43.53%

+31.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.25%

7.04%

-2.79%

Volatility

ROBE.L vs. HTWG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBE.L) is 9.94%, while L&G Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF (HTWG.L) has a volatility of 11.02%. This indicates that ROBE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HTWG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROBE.LHTWG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.94%

11.02%

-1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.85%

21.97%

-2.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.31%

31.36%

-7.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.35%

27.14%

-4.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.43%

27.25%

-5.82%

ROBE.L vs. HTWG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROBE.L has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than HTWG.L's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

ROBE.L vs. HTWG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ROBE.L nor HTWG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ROBE.L and HTWG.L have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HTWG.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HTWG.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for ROBE.L.

ROBE.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while HTWG.L is Alternative Energy Equities. ROBE.L tracks L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF, while HTWG.L tracks Solactive Hydrogen Economy Index NTR. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for ROBE.L and 0.49% for HTWG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROBE.L and HTWG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer