PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RNWZ vs. SNDK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RNWZ vs. SNDK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF (RNWZ) and Sandisk Corporation (SNDK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNWZ achieves a 15.40% return, which is significantly lower than SNDK's 734.15% return.


RNWZ

1D
0.06%
1M
0.92%
YTD
15.40%
6M
17.62%
1Y
34.43%
3Y*
11.78%
5Y*
10Y*

SNDK

1D
5.24%
1M
40.67%
YTD
734.15%
6M
860.37%
1Y
4,559.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNWZ vs. SNDK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
RNWZ
TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF
15.40%36.75%
SNDK
Sandisk Corporation
734.15%356.50%

Correlation

The correlation between RNWZ and SNDK is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2025

0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RNWZ vs. SNDK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNWZ
RNWZ Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
RNWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
RNWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

SNDK
SNDK Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SNDK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNDK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNDK Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
SNDK Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNDK Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNWZ vs. SNDK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF (RNWZ) and Sandisk Corporation (SNDK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RNWZSNDKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-45.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

2.16

-0.77

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.81

152.17

-147.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.90

461.00

-448.09

RNWZ vs. SNDK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNWZ Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is lower than the SNDK Sharpe Ratio of 47.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNWZ and SNDK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RNWZ vs. SNDK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNWZ drawdown since its inception was -24.90%, smaller than the maximum SNDK drawdown of -47.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNWZ and SNDK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RNWZSNDKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.90%

-47.50%

+22.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.07%

-31.34%

+24.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.19%

0.00%

-5.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.17%

-13.74%

+6.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

10.32%

-7.69%

Volatility

RNWZ vs. SNDK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF (RNWZ) is 5.01%, while Sandisk Corporation (SNDK) has a volatility of 26.68%. This indicates that RNWZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SNDK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RNWZSNDKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.01%

26.68%

-21.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.10%

71.96%

-59.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.25%

99.48%

-84.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.98%

97.64%

-80.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.98%

97.64%

-80.66%

Dividends

RNWZ vs. SNDK - Dividend Comparison

RNWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, while SNDK has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
RNWZ
TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF
1.94%2.12%2.36%3.87%0.01%
SNDK
Sandisk Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RNWZ and SNDK have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SNDK has higher volatility (26.68%) compared to RNWZ (5.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNWZ dropped -24.90% vs SNDK's -47.50%.

SNDK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (47.94 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RNWZ and SNDK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer