RNWZ vs. PBOG
RNWZ (TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF) and PBOG (Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. RNWZ is actively managed, while PBOG is passively managed. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RNWZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for PBOG.
Performance
RNWZ vs. PBOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RNWZ achieves a 13.62% return, which is significantly lower than PBOG's 20.33% return.
RNWZ
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -2.92%
- YTD
- 13.62%
- 6M
- 14.12%
- 1Y
- 31.84%
- 3Y*
- 11.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBOG
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -9.73%
- YTD
- 20.33%
- 6M
- 21.36%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RNWZ vs. PBOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RNWZ TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF | 13.62% | 1.88% |
PBOG Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF | 20.33% | 1.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between RNWZ and PBOG is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RNWZ vs. PBOG — Risk / Return Rank
RNWZ
PBOG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RNWZ vs. PBOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF (RNWZ) and Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF (PBOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RNWZ | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.34 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.33 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RNWZ vs. PBOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RNWZ drawdown since its inception was -24.90%, which is greater than PBOG's maximum drawdown of -16.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNWZ and PBOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RNWZ | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.90% | -16.46% | -8.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.64% | -15.19% | +8.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.16% | -3.86% | -3.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | — | — |
Volatility
RNWZ vs. PBOG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RNWZ | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.99% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.21% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.30% | 23.95% | -8.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 23.95% | -7.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 23.95% | -7.00% |
RNWZ vs. PBOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
RNWZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PBOG's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
RNWZ vs. PBOG - Dividend Comparison
RNWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, more than PBOG's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBOG Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF | 0.14% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RNWZ TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF | 1.97% | 2.12% | 2.36% | 3.87% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RNWZ and PBOG have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBOG is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBOG is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for RNWZ.
RNWZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 0.14% for PBOG.
They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and Portfolio Building Blocks. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for RNWZ and 0.13% for PBOG.
Find the right allocation for RNWZ and PBOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer