PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RNRU.L vs. WNDG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RNRU.L vs. WNDG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Global X Renewable Energy Producers UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (RNRU.L) and Global X Wind Energy UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (WNDG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNRU.L achieves a 19.04% return, which is significantly higher than WNDG.L's 16.77% return.


RNRU.L

1D
-2.01%
1M
-0.85%
YTD
19.04%
6M
18.52%
1Y
50.49%
3Y*
2.64%
5Y*
10Y*

WNDG.L

1D
-1.72%
1M
-8.21%
YTD
16.77%
6M
17.23%
1Y
43.35%
3Y*
-0.34%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNRU.L vs. WNDG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
RNRU.L
Global X Renewable Energy Producers UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
19.04%24.83%-21.90%-19.50%7.70%
WNDG.L
Global X Wind Energy UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
16.77%23.53%-18.76%-23.82%-3.71%

Correlation

The correlation between RNRU.L and WNDG.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2022

0.61

The correlation between RNRU.L and WNDG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RNRU.L vs. WNDG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNRU.L
RNRU.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
RNRU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNRU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNRU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
RNRU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNRU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

WNDG.L
WNDG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
WNDG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNDG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNDG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
WNDG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNDG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNRU.L vs. WNDG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Renewable Energy Producers UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (RNRU.L) and Global X Wind Energy UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (WNDG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RNRU.LWNDG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.39

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.92

4.94

+3.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

29.05

16.13

+12.91

RNRU.L vs. WNDG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNRU.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.13, which is higher than the WNDG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNRU.L and WNDG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RNRU.LWNDG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.13

2.23

+0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.12

-0.17

+0.05

Drawdowns

RNRU.L vs. WNDG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNRU.L drawdown since its inception was -53.53%, roughly equal to the maximum WNDG.L drawdown of -52.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNRU.L and WNDG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RNRU.LWNDG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.53%

-52.03%

-1.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.56%

-8.76%

+3.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.25%

-38.73%

+1.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.48%

-21.30%

+0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.04%

-28.82%

-0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

2.69%

-0.98%

Volatility

RNRU.L vs. WNDG.L - Volatility Comparison

Global X Renewable Energy Producers UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (RNRU.L) has a higher volatility of 5.73% compared to Global X Wind Energy UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (WNDG.L) at 4.77%. This indicates that RNRU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WNDG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RNRU.LWNDG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.73%

4.77%

+0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.94%

13.61%

-1.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.86%

19.43%

-3.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.35%

20.70%

-2.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.35%

20.70%

-2.35%

RNRU.L vs. WNDG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RNRU.L and WNDG.L have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

RNRU.L vs. WNDG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither RNRU.L nor WNDG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


RNRU.L and WNDG.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RNRU.L and WNDG.L have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

Both ETFs track S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RNRU.L and WNDG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer