PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RNRU.L vs. WDEE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RNRU.L vs. WDEE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Global X Renewable Energy Producers UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (RNRU.L) and Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc (WDEE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

RNRU.L is traded in GBP, while WDEE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WDEE.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNRU.L achieves a 19.04% return, which is significantly lower than WDEE.L's 30.50% return.


RNRU.L

1D
-2.01%
1M
-0.85%
YTD
19.04%
6M
18.52%
1Y
50.49%
3Y*
2.64%
5Y*
10Y*

WDEE.L

1D
-0.74%
1M
-1.16%
YTD
30.50%
6M
26.32%
1Y
40.90%
3Y*
15.96%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNRU.L vs. WDEE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
RNRU.L
Global X Renewable Energy Producers UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
19.04%24.83%-21.90%-10.33%
WDEE.L
Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc
30.46%1.24%5.84%4.65%

Correlation

The correlation between RNRU.L and WDEE.L is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2023

0.19

The correlation between RNRU.L and WDEE.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RNRU.L vs. WDEE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNRU.L
RNRU.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
RNRU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNRU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNRU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
RNRU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNRU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

WDEE.L
WDEE.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
WDEE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WDEE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
WDEE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
WDEE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
WDEE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNRU.L vs. WDEE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Renewable Energy Producers UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (RNRU.L) and Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc (WDEE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RNRU.LWDEE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.36

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.92

3.43

+5.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

29.05

10.75

+18.30

RNRU.L vs. WDEE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNRU.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.13, which is higher than the WDEE.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNRU.L and WDEE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RNRU.LWDEE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.13

2.09

+1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.12

0.67

-0.79

Drawdowns

RNRU.L vs. WDEE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNRU.L drawdown since its inception was -53.53%, which is greater than WDEE.L's maximum drawdown of -21.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNRU.L and WDEE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RNRU.LWDEE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.53%

-21.91%

-31.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.56%

-11.86%

+6.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.25%

-21.91%

-15.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.48%

-5.47%

-15.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.04%

-7.26%

-21.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

3.79%

-2.08%

Volatility

RNRU.L vs. WDEE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Renewable Energy Producers UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (RNRU.L) is 5.73%, while Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc (WDEE.L) has a volatility of 7.32%. This indicates that RNRU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WDEE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RNRU.LWDEE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.73%

7.32%

-1.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.94%

15.99%

-4.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.86%

19.54%

-3.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.35%

19.34%

-0.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.35%

19.34%

-0.99%

RNRU.L vs. WDEE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

RNRU.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than WDEE.L's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

RNRU.L vs. WDEE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither RNRU.L nor WDEE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


RNRU.L and WDEE.L have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WDEE.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WDEE.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RNRU.L.

RNRU.L tracks S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD, while WDEE.L tracks S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RNRU.L and 0.18% for WDEE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RNRU.L and WDEE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer