RND vs. BLCR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RND (First Trust Bloomberg R&D Leaders ETF) and BLCR (Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. RND is passively managed, while BLCR is actively managed. Over the past year, RND returned 20.03% vs 41.08% for BLCR. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RND charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for BLCR.

Performance

RND vs. BLCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Bloomberg R&D Leaders ETF (RND) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RND achieves a 1.67% return, which is significantly lower than BLCR's 16.77% return.

RND

• 1D: -1.59%
• 1M: -2.84%
• YTD: 1.67%
• 6M: 0.70%
• 1Y: 20.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BLCR

• 1D: -1.69%
• 1M: -0.41%
• YTD: 16.77%
• 6M: 15.78%
• 1Y: 41.08%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RND vs. BLCR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
RND First Trust Bloomberg R&D Leaders ETF	1.67%	22.38%	26.88%
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	16.77%	30.93%	11.23%

Correlation

The correlation between RND and BLCR is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2024	0.88

The correlation between RND and BLCR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

RND vs. BLCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RND	BLCR
Technology	47.2%	34.3%
Consumer Cyclical	15.7%	11.1%
Communication Services	13.4%	14.6%
Healthcare	13.3%	7.6%
Industrials	7.4%	13.7%
Consumer Defensive	1.2%	-
Financial Services	1.1%	12.5%
Basic Materials	0.9%	2.2%
Energy	-	2.2%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	1.6%

Return for Risk

RND vs. BLCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RND

RND Risk / Return Rank: 34
RND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
RND Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
RND Omega Ratio Rank: 35
RND Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
RND Martin Ratio Rank: 33

BLCR

BLCR Risk / Return Rank: 82
BLCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
BLCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
BLCR Omega Ratio Rank: 78
BLCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
BLCR Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RND vs. BLCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg R&D Leaders ETF (RND) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RND	BLCR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.22	2.51	-1.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.71	3.34	-1.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.43	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.29	4.02	-2.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.58	18.20	-13.62

RND vs. BLCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RND Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is lower than the BLCR Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RND and BLCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RND vs. BLCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RND drawdown since its inception was -23.52%, which is greater than BLCR's maximum drawdown of -21.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RND and BLCR.

Drawdown Indicators

	RND	BLCR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.52%	-21.29%	-2.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.56%	-10.26%	-5.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.30%	-2.70%	-2.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.71%	-2.19%	-1.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.39%	2.26%	+2.13%

Volatility

RND vs. BLCR - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Bloomberg R&D Leaders ETF (RND) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR) have volatilities of 6.27% and 6.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RND	BLCR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.27%	6.32%	-0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.84%	13.18%	-0.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.55%	16.45%	+0.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.27%	17.67%	+3.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.27%	17.67%	+3.60%

RND vs. BLCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

RND has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than BLCR's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

RND vs. BLCR - Dividend Comparison

RND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BLCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	0.29%	0.33%	0.75%	0.13%
RND First Trust Bloomberg R&D Leaders ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.04%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RND and BLCR in my portfolio?

RND and BLCR have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RND or BLCR?

BLCR has higher volatility (6.32%) compared to RND (6.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RND dropped -23.52% vs BLCR's -21.29%.

Which ETF is better, RND or BLCR?

On 1-year performance, BLCR leads with 41.08% vs 20.03% for RND. On fees, BLCR is cheaper at 0.36% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RND or BLCR?

Over the 1-year period, BLCR has performed better with a 41.08% return vs 20.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RND or BLCR?

BLCR is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for RND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RND or BLCR?

BLCR has the higher dividend yield at 0.29%, compared with 0.00% for RND.

What is the main difference between RND and BLCR?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for RND and 0.36% for BLCR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BLCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.