PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RMTBX vs. BDMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RMTBX vs. BDMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aspiriant Risk-Managed Taxable Bond Fund (RMTBX) and BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund Class I (BDMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMTBX achieves a -0.65% return, which is significantly lower than BDMIX's 12.04% return.


RMTBX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.82%
6M
-1.11%
YTD
-0.65%
1Y
2.36%
3Y*
3.55%
5Y*
0.23%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.95%

BDMIX

1D
1.13%
1M
1.65%
6M
10.90%
YTD
12.04%
1Y
23.58%
3Y*
20.48%
5Y*
13.14%
10Y*
8.48%
ALL TIME*
6.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RMTBX vs. BDMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
RMTBX
Aspiriant Risk-Managed Taxable Bond Fund
-0.65%7.25%0.54%7.76%-11.67%-0.57%6.63%7.63%0.91%
BDMIX
BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund Class I
12.04%18.30%21.39%14.55%1.80%3.34%0.29%-0.85%3.05%

Correlation

The correlation between RMTBX and BDMIX is 0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2018

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RMTBX vs. BDMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RMTBX
RMTBX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
RMTBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMTBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMTBX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
RMTBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMTBX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

BDMIX
BDMIX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
BDMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
BDMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RMTBX vs. BDMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aspiriant Risk-Managed Taxable Bond Fund (RMTBX) and BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund Class I (BDMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RMTBXBDMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.61

-0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

7.38

-6.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.15

19.61

-17.46

RMTBX vs. BDMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMTBX Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the BDMIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMTBX and BDMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RMTBX vs. BDMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMTBX drawdown since its inception was -17.19%, which is greater than BDMIX's maximum drawdown of -11.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMTBX and BDMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RMTBXBDMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.19%

-11.89%

-5.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.52%

-3.24%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.24%

-4.07%

-2.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.19%

-5.23%

-11.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.57%

-1.06%

-1.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.02%

-2.67%

-1.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.44%

1.22%

+0.22%

Volatility

RMTBX vs. BDMIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aspiriant Risk-Managed Taxable Bond Fund (RMTBX) is 0.94%, while BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund Class I (BDMIX) has a volatility of 2.53%. This indicates that RMTBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BDMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RMTBXBDMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.94%

2.53%

-1.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.03%

5.37%

-2.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.66%

7.39%

-3.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.55%

6.68%

-1.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.74%

5.90%

-1.16%

RMTBX vs. BDMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMTBX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than BDMIX's 1.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

RMTBX vs. BDMIX - Dividend Comparison

RMTBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%, less than BDMIX's 11.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BDMIX
BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund Class I
11.55%8.94%13.26%7.42%0.00%1.23%0.30%6.78%0.94%0.00%0.00%1.86%
RMTBX
Aspiriant Risk-Managed Taxable Bond Fund
3.46%3.34%3.13%5.19%4.47%4.35%5.40%3.38%2.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RMTBX and BDMIX have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BDMIX has higher volatility (2.53%) compared to RMTBX (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMTBX dropped -17.19% vs BDMIX's -11.89%.

BDMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RMTBX and BDMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer