PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RMTBX vs. BDJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RMTBX vs. BDJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aspiriant Risk-Managed Taxable Bond Fund (RMTBX) and BlackRock Enhanced Equity Dividend Fund (BDJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMTBX achieves a 0.12% return, which is significantly lower than BDJ's 2.24% return.


RMTBX

1D
0.23%
1M
1.05%
YTD
0.12%
6M
0.27%
1Y
4.98%
3Y*
4.10%
5Y*
0.55%
10Y*

BDJ

1D
0.65%
1M
2.09%
YTD
2.24%
6M
3.88%
1Y
19.84%
3Y*
14.45%
5Y*
8.00%
10Y*
10.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMTBX vs. BDJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
RMTBX
Aspiriant Risk-Managed Taxable Bond Fund
0.12%7.25%0.54%7.76%-11.67%-0.57%6.63%7.63%0.91%
BDJ
BlackRock Enhanced Equity Dividend Fund
2.24%26.12%16.87%-6.67%0.83%26.56%-7.58%37.43%-6.18%

Correlation

The correlation between RMTBX and BDJ is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2018

0.10

Over the past year, RMTBX and BDJ have become more correlated (0.34) than their long-term average of 0.10, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RMTBX vs. BDJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMTBX
RMTBX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
RMTBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMTBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMTBX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
RMTBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMTBX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

BDJ
BDJ Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
BDJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDJ Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
BDJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDJ Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMTBX vs. BDJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aspiriant Risk-Managed Taxable Bond Fund (RMTBX) and BlackRock Enhanced Equity Dividend Fund (BDJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RMTBXBDJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.28

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

1.62

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.99

5.91

-1.92

RMTBX vs. BDJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMTBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the BDJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMTBX and BDJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RMTBX vs. BDJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMTBX drawdown since its inception was -17.19%, smaller than the maximum BDJ drawdown of -59.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMTBX and BDJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RMTBXBDJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.19%

-59.46%

+42.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.52%

-12.28%

+8.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.24%

-15.70%

+9.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.19%

-21.39%

+4.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.82%

-1.38%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.05%

-8.94%

+4.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.25%

3.36%

-2.11%

Volatility

RMTBX vs. BDJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aspiriant Risk-Managed Taxable Bond Fund (RMTBX) is 1.07%, while BlackRock Enhanced Equity Dividend Fund (BDJ) has a volatility of 3.42%. This indicates that RMTBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BDJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RMTBXBDJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.07%

3.42%

-2.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.93%

9.48%

-6.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.67%

12.19%

-8.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.53%

16.11%

-10.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.75%

18.43%

-13.68%

RMTBX vs. BDJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMTBX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than BDJ's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

RMTBX vs. BDJ - Dividend Comparison

RMTBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, less than BDJ's 9.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BDJ
BlackRock Enhanced Equity Dividend Fund
9.19%9.03%8.21%9.49%12.18%5.95%7.08%6.66%7.21%6.07%6.88%7.36%
RMTBX
Aspiriant Risk-Managed Taxable Bond Fund
3.33%3.34%3.13%5.19%4.47%4.35%5.40%3.38%2.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RMTBX and BDJ have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BDJ has higher volatility (3.42%) compared to RMTBX (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMTBX dropped -17.19% vs BDJ's -59.46%.

BDJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RMTBX and BDJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer