PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RMS.AX vs. 1258.HK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RMS.AX vs. 1258.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Ramelius Resources Limited (RMS.AX) and China Nonferrous Mining Corp Ltd (1258.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

RMS.AX is traded in AUD, while 1258.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 1258.HK values have been converted to AUD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMS.AX achieves a -29.69% return, which is significantly lower than 1258.HK's -8.73% return. Over the past 10 years, RMS.AX has underperformed 1258.HK with an annualized return of 18.93%, while 1258.HK has yielded a comparatively higher 35.89% annualized return.


RMS.AX

1D
1.21%
1M
-6.85%
6M
-36.27%
YTD
-29.69%
1Y
18.17%
3Y*
31.99%
5Y*
13.14%
10Y*
18.93%
ALL TIME*
14.62%

1258.HK

1D
6.62%
1M
5.12%
6M
-6.39%
YTD
-8.73%
1Y
68.67%
3Y*
56.02%
5Y*
36.16%
10Y*
35.89%
ALL TIME*
20.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMS.AX vs. 1258.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RMS.AX
Ramelius Resources Limited
-29.69%106.60%25.42%84.56%-39.89%-5.57%37.61%165.94%22.08%-23.00%
1258.HK
China Nonferrous Mining Corp Ltd
-8.73%172.63%16.98%36.04%49.33%52.73%15.21%-1.98%1.58%42.79%

Correlation

The correlation between RMS.AX and 1258.HK is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2012

0.10

Over the past year, RMS.AX and 1258.HK have become more correlated (0.51) than their long-term average of 0.10, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RMS.AX vs. 1258.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMS.AX
RMS.AX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
RMS.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMS.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMS.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
RMS.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMS.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

1258.HK
1258.HK Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
1258.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
1258.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
1258.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
1258.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
1258.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMS.AX vs. 1258.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ramelius Resources Limited (RMS.AX) and China Nonferrous Mining Corp Ltd (1258.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RMS.AX1258.HKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.20

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.45

1.69

-1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.94

3.61

-2.67

RMS.AX vs. 1258.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMS.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the 1258.HK Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMS.AX and 1258.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RMS.AX vs. 1258.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMS.AX drawdown since its inception was -98.09%, which is greater than 1258.HK's maximum drawdown of -67.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMS.AX and 1258.HK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RMS.AX1258.HKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.09%

-67.23%

-30.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.05%

-41.86%

-2.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.05%

-44.24%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.55%

-44.24%

-22.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.94%

-54.55%

-20.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.96%

-21.75%

-20.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.75%

-26.87%

-27.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.49%

19.37%

+2.12%

Volatility

RMS.AX vs. 1258.HK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ramelius Resources Limited (RMS.AX) is 14.41%, while China Nonferrous Mining Corp Ltd (1258.HK) has a volatility of 22.01%. This indicates that RMS.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 1258.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RMS.AX1258.HKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.41%

22.01%

-7.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.24%

48.93%

-8.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.04%

67.18%

-15.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.01%

54.03%

-5.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.25%

57.22%

-2.97%

Dividends

RMS.AX vs. 1258.HK - Dividend Comparison

RMS.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, less than 1258.HK's 2.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
1258.HK
China Nonferrous Mining Corp Ltd
2.35%2.28%4.43%4.31%7.48%3.59%2.73%3.61%2.45%0.00%0.00%1.30%
RMS.AX
Ramelius Resources Limited
1.71%1.92%2.42%1.18%1.08%1.59%1.18%0.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

RMS.AX vs. 1258.HK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ramelius Resources Limited and China Nonferrous Mining Corp Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. RMS.AX values in AUD, 1258.HK values in HKD

Frequently Asked Questions


RMS.AX and 1258.HK have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RMS.AX and 1258.HK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer