RMLPX vs. FSTEX
Compare and contrast key facts about Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund (RMLPX) and Invesco Energy Fund (FSTEX).
RMLPX is managed by Rrecurrent Advisors. It was launched on Nov 1, 2017. FSTEX is managed by Invesco. It was launched on Jan 18, 1984.
Performance
RMLPX vs. FSTEX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RMLPX vs. FSTEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMLPX Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund | 31.75% | 8.98% | 30.03% | 16.79% | 35.03% | 42.56% | -28.37% | 15.33% | -15.93% |
FSTEX Invesco Energy Fund | 38.85% | 12.31% | 6.00% | 0.28% | 52.85% | 55.99% | -32.13% | 4.78% | -28.20% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMLPX achieves a 31.75% return, which is significantly lower than FSTEX's 38.85% return.
RMLPX
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- 10.14%
- YTD
- 31.75%
- 6M
- 31.23%
- 1Y
- 36.53%
- 3Y*
- 29.25%
- 5Y*
- 28.54%
- 10Y*
- —
FSTEX
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 13.19%
- YTD
- 38.85%
- 6M
- 42.88%
- 1Y
- 43.71%
- 3Y*
- 20.07%
- 5Y*
- 25.80%
- 10Y*
- 8.77%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RMLPX vs. FSTEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMLPX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FSTEX's 1.36% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RMLPX vs. FSTEX — Risk / Return Rank
RMLPX
FSTEX
RMLPX vs. FSTEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund (RMLPX) and Invesco Energy Fund (FSTEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RMLPX | FSTEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.87 | 2.04 | -0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.33 | 2.54 | -0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.37 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | 2.31 | -0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.80 | 8.35 | +0.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RMLPX | FSTEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87 | 2.04 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.35 | 1.03 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.27 | +0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between RMLPX and FSTEX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RMLPX vs. FSTEX - Dividend Comparison
RMLPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%, more than FSTEX's 1.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMLPX Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund | 4.89% | 6.38% | 7.63% | 6.49% | 7.08% | 8.89% | 13.48% | 7.25% | 5.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FSTEX Invesco Energy Fund | 1.60% | 2.22% | 4.03% | 2.11% | 0.89% | 1.80% | 2.21% | 1.53% | 3.05% | 2.22% | 1.10% | 1.58% |
Drawdowns
RMLPX vs. FSTEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMLPX drawdown since its inception was -66.95%, smaller than the maximum FSTEX drawdown of -83.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMLPX and FSTEX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMLPX | FSTEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.95% | -83.31% | +16.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.37% | -18.57% | +2.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.83% | -26.88% | +4.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.94% | -0.55% | -0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.40% | -25.28% | +14.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.16% | 5.13% | -0.97% |
Volatility
RMLPX vs. FSTEX - Volatility Comparison
Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund (RMLPX) and Invesco Energy Fund (FSTEX) have volatilities of 4.41% and 4.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RMLPX | FSTEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.41% | 4.36% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.03% | 12.75% | -1.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.93% | 22.29% | -2.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.32% | 25.29% | -3.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.16% | 29.77% | -1.61% |