RMDAX vs. AIO

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

RMDAX (Virtus Silvant Mid-Cap Growth Fund Class A) and AIO (Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund) are both mutual funds - RMDAX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Virtus, while AIO is a Technology Equities fund managed by Virtus. Over the past 5 years, RMDAX returned 7.94%/yr vs 12.22%/yr for AIO. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RMDAX charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.41%/yr for AIO.

Performance

RMDAX vs. AIO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Silvant Mid-Cap Growth Fund Class A (RMDAX) and Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund (AIO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMDAX achieves a 15.07% return, which is significantly lower than AIO's 24.75% return.

RMDAX

• 1D: 1.20%
• 1M: 3.92%
• YTD: 15.07%
• 6M: 11.99%
• 1Y: 23.69%
• 3Y*: 22.88%
• 5Y*: 7.94%
• 10Y*: 14.60%

AIO

• 1D: -4.02%
• 1M: 2.58%
• YTD: 24.75%
• 6M: 22.76%
• 1Y: 23.76%
• 3Y*: 26.44%
• 5Y*: 12.22%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMDAX vs. AIO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
RMDAX Virtus Silvant Mid-Cap Growth Fund Class A	15.07%	17.91%	20.11%	24.34%	-32.59%	14.34%	54.94%	8.49%
AIO Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund	24.75%	0.48%	54.48%	19.27%	-28.06%	13.51%	46.27%	1.05%

Correlation

The correlation between RMDAX and AIO is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2019	0.74

The correlation between RMDAX and AIO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RMDAX vs. AIO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMDAX

RMDAX Risk / Return Rank: 22
RMDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
RMDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
RMDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
RMDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
RMDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 26

AIO

AIO Risk / Return Rank: 25
AIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
AIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
AIO Omega Ratio Rank: 21
AIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
AIO Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMDAX vs. AIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Silvant Mid-Cap Growth Fund Class A (RMDAX) and Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund (AIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RMDAX	AIO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.22	1.31	-0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.78	1.90	-0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.23	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.69	2.09	-0.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.87	6.19	-0.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RMDAX vs. AIO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMDAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is comparable to the AIO Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMDAX and AIO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RMDAX	AIO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.22	1.31	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33	0.56	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.63	-0.13

Drawdowns

RMDAX vs. AIO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMDAX drawdown since its inception was -56.31%, which is greater than AIO's maximum drawdown of -44.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMDAX and AIO.

Drawdown Indicators

	RMDAX	AIO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.31%	-44.88%	-11.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.81%	-11.42%	-2.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.02%	-30.23%	+3.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.72%	-37.39%	-6.33%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.72%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-4.23%	+4.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.00%	-10.94%	+0.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.96%	3.85%	+0.11%

Volatility

RMDAX vs. AIO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus Silvant Mid-Cap Growth Fund Class A (RMDAX) is 5.15%, while Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund (AIO) has a volatility of 6.92%. This indicates that RMDAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RMDAX	AIO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.15%	6.92%	-1.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.08%	14.05%	+1.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.10%	18.25%	+0.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.11%	22.10%	+2.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.63%	26.91%	-3.28%

RMDAX vs. AIO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMDAX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than AIO's 1.41% expense ratio.

Dividends

RMDAX vs. AIO - Dividend Comparison

RMDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.58%, more than AIO's 11.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AIO Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund	11.39%	13.75%	7.30%	10.34%	11.12%	19.97%	9.31%	0.54%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RMDAX Virtus Silvant Mid-Cap Growth Fund Class A	19.58%	22.53%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	35.29%	10.87%	4.87%	16.75%	9.99%	8.25%	6.27%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RMDAX and AIO in my portfolio?

RMDAX and AIO have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RMDAX or AIO?

AIO has higher volatility (6.92%) compared to RMDAX (5.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMDAX dropped -56.31% vs AIO's -44.88%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AIO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.