RMCA vs. TAXS

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

RMCA (Rockefeller California Municipal Bond ETF) and TAXS (Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. RMCA is actively managed, while TAXS is passively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RMCA charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for TAXS.

Performance

RMCA vs. TAXS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rockefeller California Municipal Bond ETF (RMCA) and Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMCA achieves a 3.06% return, which is significantly higher than TAXS's 1.06% return.

RMCA

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: 1.94%
• YTD: 3.06%
• 6M: 3.12%
• 1Y: 7.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TAXS

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 0.65%
• YTD: 1.06%
• 6M: 1.15%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMCA vs. TAXS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RMCA Rockefeller California Municipal Bond ETF	3.06%	5.10%
TAXS Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF	1.06%	1.22%

Correlation

The correlation between RMCA and TAXS is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025	0.62

Return for Risk

RMCA vs. TAXS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMCA

RMCA Risk / Return Rank: 76
RMCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
RMCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
RMCA Omega Ratio Rank: 85
RMCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
RMCA Martin Ratio Rank: 67

TAXS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMCA vs. TAXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rockefeller California Municipal Bond ETF (RMCA) and Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RMCA	TAXS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.09	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.18	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.23	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.75	—	—

Drawdowns

RMCA vs. TAXS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMCA drawdown since its inception was -5.95%, which is greater than TAXS's maximum drawdown of -0.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMCA and TAXS.

Drawdown Indicators

	RMCA	TAXS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.95%	-0.84%	-5.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.01%	+0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.58%	-0.22%	-1.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.70%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RMCA	TAXS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.91%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.49%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.62%	0.99%	+2.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.32%	0.99%	+4.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.32%	0.99%	+4.33%

RMCA vs. TAXS - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMCA has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than TAXS's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

RMCA vs. TAXS - Dividend Comparison

RMCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, more than TAXS's 1.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
RMCA Rockefeller California Municipal Bond ETF	4.33%	4.51%	1.20%
TAXS Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF	1.82%	0.74%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RMCA and TAXS in my portfolio?

RMCA and TAXS have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RMCA or TAXS?

On fees, TAXS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RMCA or TAXS?

TAXS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for RMCA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RMCA or TAXS?

RMCA has the higher dividend yield at 4.33%, compared with 1.82% for TAXS.

What is the main difference between RMCA and TAXS?

They also come from different issuers: Rockefeller and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for RMCA and 0.05% for TAXS.