RMBBX vs. SSCPX
Compare and contrast key facts about RMB Small Cap Fund (RMBBX) and Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio (SSCPX).
RMBBX is managed by RMB Funds. It was launched on Aug 30, 2002. SSCPX is managed by Saratoga. It was launched on Sep 1, 1994.
Performance
RMBBX vs. SSCPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RMBBX vs. SSCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMBBX RMB Small Cap Fund | -3.21% | -0.06% | 15.10% | 18.71% | -24.78% | 24.32% | 17.62% | 27.51% | -5.47% | 10.48% |
SSCPX Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio | -2.63% | 6.41% | 10.79% | 15.16% | -17.56% | 24.53% | 25.39% | 23.71% | -16.14% | 15.58% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMBBX achieves a -3.21% return, which is significantly lower than SSCPX's -2.63% return. Over the past 10 years, RMBBX has underperformed SSCPX with an annualized return of 8.22%, while SSCPX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.16% annualized return.
RMBBX
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- -8.07%
- YTD
- -3.21%
- 6M
- -2.81%
- 1Y
- 4.89%
- 3Y*
- 7.55%
- 5Y*
- 2.41%
- 10Y*
- 8.22%
SSCPX
- 1D
- -1.77%
- 1M
- -8.88%
- YTD
- -2.63%
- 6M
- -3.54%
- 1Y
- 16.77%
- 3Y*
- 9.57%
- 5Y*
- 3.88%
- 10Y*
- 9.16%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RMBBX vs. SSCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMBBX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is lower than SSCPX's 1.70% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RMBBX vs. SSCPX — Risk / Return Rank
RMBBX
SSCPX
RMBBX vs. SSCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RMB Small Cap Fund (RMBBX) and Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio (SSCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RMBBX | SSCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.22 | 0.72 | -0.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.48 | 1.14 | -0.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.14 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.20 | 1.17 | -0.97 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.84 | 3.79 | -2.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RMBBX | SSCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 | 0.72 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 0.18 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.40 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.36 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between RMBBX and SSCPX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RMBBX vs. SSCPX - Dividend Comparison
RMBBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.18%, less than SSCPX's 9.26% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMBBX RMB Small Cap Fund | 6.18% | 5.98% | 2.15% | 5.62% | 2.75% | 6.44% | 4.38% | 4.73% | 45.44% | 21.23% | 3.70% | 9.34% |
SSCPX Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio | 9.26% | 9.02% | 11.37% | 0.00% | 10.18% | 24.67% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 17.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 58.90% |
Drawdowns
RMBBX vs. SSCPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMBBX drawdown since its inception was -55.87%, roughly equal to the maximum SSCPX drawdown of -53.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMBBX and SSCPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMBBX | SSCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.87% | -53.65% | -2.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.73% | -11.83% | -1.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.41% | -27.78% | -2.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.10% | -43.59% | +4.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.30% | -11.54% | -0.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.78% | -10.30% | +1.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | 3.66% | -0.37% |
Volatility
RMBBX vs. SSCPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RMB Small Cap Fund (RMBBX) is 5.30%, while Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio (SSCPX) has a volatility of 7.50%. This indicates that RMBBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RMBBX | SSCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.30% | 7.50% | -2.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.51% | 14.84% | -3.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.32% | 22.41% | -1.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.83% | 22.10% | -1.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.27% | 22.90% | -1.63% |