PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
RMAX.TO vs. SRVR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

RMAX.TO vs. SRVR

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

RMAX.TO (Hamilton REITs YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF) and SRVR (Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF) are both REIT funds. Over the past year, RMAX.TO returned 15.41% vs 8.49% for SRVR. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RMAX.TO charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SRVR.

Performance

RMAX.TO vs. SRVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton REITs YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (RMAX.TO) and Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

RMAX.TO is traded in CAD, while SRVR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SRVR values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMAX.TO achieves a 12.71% return, which is significantly lower than SRVR's 19.07% return.

RMAX.TO

1D
0.12%
1M
3.22%
YTD
12.71%
6M
13.43%
1Y
15.41%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

SRVR

1D
-1.10%
1M
-3.54%
YTD
19.07%
6M
18.92%
1Y
8.49%
3Y*
10.19%
5Y*
0.84%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMAX.TO vs. SRVR - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024
RMAX.TO
Hamilton REITs YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF		12.71%5.39%9.49%
SRVR
Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF		19.07%-6.47%16.87%

Correlation

The correlation between RMAX.TO and SRVR is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2024

0.51

The correlation between RMAX.TO and SRVR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Hamilton REITs YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF

Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF

Often compared with RMAX.TO:
RMAX.TO vs. MREL.TORMAX.TO vs. RIT.TORMAX.TO vs. ZRE.TORMAX.TO vs. APR-UN.TORMAX.TO vs. HGR.TORMAX.TO vs. VRAIRMAX.TO vs. UKRE.L
Often compared with SRVR:
SRVR vs. DTCRSRVR vs. VNQSRVR vs. EQIXSRVR vs. INDSSRVR vs. REETSRVR vs. VPNSRVR vs. VRNS

Return for Risk

RMAX.TO vs. SRVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
RMAX.TO
RMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
RMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
RMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
SRVR
SRVR Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
SRVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRVR Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
SRVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRVR Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMAX.TO vs. SRVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton REITs YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (RMAX.TO) and Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

RMAX.TOSRVRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.41
0.49

+0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.99
0.82

+1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.10

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

0.61

+1.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.78

1.45

+4.33

RMAX.TO vs. SRVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is higher than the SRVR Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMAX.TO and SRVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RMAX.TO vs. SRVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMAX.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.90%, smaller than the maximum SRVR drawdown of -36.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMAX.TO and SRVR.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

RMAX.TOSRVRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.90%

-36.44%

+20.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.42%

-13.90%

+7.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-16.74%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-36.44%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.41%

+6.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.60%

-12.91%

+9.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

5.86%

-3.19%

Volatility

RMAX.TO vs. SRVR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hamilton REITs YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (RMAX.TO) is 3.20%, while Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) has a volatility of 6.07%. This indicates that RMAX.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

RMAX.TOSRVRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.20%

6.07%

-2.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.57%

13.96%

-5.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.10%

17.58%

-6.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.91%

20.52%

-7.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.91%

22.29%

-9.38%

RMAX.TO vs. SRVR - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMAX.TO has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than SRVR's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

RMAX.TO vs. SRVR - Dividend Comparison

RMAX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.12%, more than SRVR's 2.67% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
RMAX.TO
Hamilton REITs YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF		10.12%10.65%4.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SRVR
Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF		2.67%2.67%2.00%3.69%1.70%1.19%1.59%1.61%2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

RMAX.TO and SRVR have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SRVR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SRVR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for RMAX.TO.

They also come from different issuers: Hamilton ETFs and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for RMAX.TO and 0.60% for SRVR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RMAX.TO and SRVR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer