RMAU.L vs. EEAU.DE
RMAU.L (The Royal Mint Physical Gold ETC Securities) and EEAU.DE (BNP Paribas Easy - Managed Futures UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation) are both exchange-traded funds - RMAU.L is a Commodities fund tracking the LBMA Gold PM Price, while EEAU.DE is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by BNP Paribas. RMAU.L is passively managed, while EEAU.DE is actively managed. Their -0.09 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. RMAU.L charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for EEAU.DE.
Performance
RMAU.L vs. EEAU.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
RMAU.L is traded in USD, while EEAU.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the EEAU.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
RMAU.L
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- -0.92%
- 6M
- -19.21%
- YTD
- -6.33%
- 1Y
- 22.32%
- 3Y*
- 27.32%
- 5Y*
- 16.98%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.36%
EEAU.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.81%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $23.07K | $21.81K | $19.41K | |
| $358.81K | $420.03K | $658.19K |
RMAU.L vs. EEAU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RMAU.L The Royal Mint Physical Gold ETC Securities | -1.12% |
EEAU.DE BNP Paribas Easy - Managed Futures UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation | 4.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between RMAU.L and EEAU.DE is -0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2026 | -0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RMAU.L vs. EEAU.DE — Risk / Return Rank
RMAU.L
EEAU.DE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RMAU.L vs. EEAU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Royal Mint Physical Gold ETC Securities (RMAU.L) and BNP Paribas Easy - Managed Futures UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation (EEAU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RMAU.L | EEAU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.90 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.96 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RMAU.L vs. EEAU.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMAU.L drawdown since its inception was -24.69%, which is greater than EEAU.DE's maximum drawdown of -2.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMAU.L and EEAU.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMAU.L | EEAU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.69% | -2.01% | -22.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.08% | -1.13% | -22.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.25% | -0.46% | -6.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.36% | — | — |
Volatility
RMAU.L vs. EEAU.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RMAU.L | EEAU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.98% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.16% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.68% | 11.85% | +14.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.97% | 11.85% | +6.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.05% | 11.85% | +6.20% |
RMAU.L vs. EEAU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMAU.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than EEAU.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
RMAU.L vs. EEAU.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither RMAU.L nor EEAU.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
RMAU.L and EEAU.DE have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RMAU.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RMAU.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for EEAU.DE.
RMAU.L is categorized as Commodities, while EEAU.DE is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: HANetf and BNP Paribas. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for RMAU.L and 0.60% for EEAU.DE.
Find the right allocation for RMAU.L and EEAU.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer