RLCAX vs. NQCRX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RLCAX (Columbia Disciplined Value Fund) and NQCRX (Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, RLCAX returned 11.67%/yr vs 14.09%/yr for NQCRX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RLCAX charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for NQCRX.

Performance

RLCAX vs. NQCRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Disciplined Value Fund (RLCAX) and Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund (NQCRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RLCAX having a 16.03% return and NQCRX slightly higher at 16.10%. Over the past 10 years, RLCAX has underperformed NQCRX with an annualized return of 11.67%, while NQCRX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.09% annualized return.

RLCAX

• 1D: 0.71%
• 1M: 5.27%
• YTD: 16.03%
• 6M: 18.41%
• 1Y: 31.02%
• 3Y*: 19.88%
• 5Y*: 12.26%
• 10Y*: 11.67%

NQCRX

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: 2.04%
• YTD: 16.10%
• 6M: 17.86%
• 1Y: 36.85%
• 3Y*: 22.52%
• 5Y*: 13.93%
• 10Y*: 14.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RLCAX vs. NQCRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RLCAX Columbia Disciplined Value Fund	16.03%	14.67%	16.24%	15.40%	-7.33%	29.54%	2.11%	19.23%	-9.36%	15.42%
NQCRX Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund	16.10%	22.44%	17.74%	13.76%	-1.07%	25.38%	-0.27%	47.63%	-15.47%	15.46%

Correlation

The correlation between RLCAX and NQCRX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2009	0.94

The correlation between RLCAX and NQCRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RLCAX vs. NQCRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RLCAX

RLCAX Risk / Return Rank: 88
RLCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
RLCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
RLCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
RLCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
RLCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

NQCRX

NQCRX Risk / Return Rank: 91
NQCRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
NQCRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
NQCRX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
NQCRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
NQCRX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RLCAX vs. NQCRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Disciplined Value Fund (RLCAX) and Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund (NQCRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RLCAX	NQCRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.98	3.10	-0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.25	4.26	0.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.54	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.07	6.31	-1.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.13	23.54	-3.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RLCAX vs. NQCRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RLCAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.98, which is comparable to the NQCRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RLCAX and NQCRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RLCAX	NQCRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.98	3.10	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53	0.90	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54	0.75	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	0.39	+0.17

Drawdowns

RLCAX vs. NQCRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RLCAX drawdown since its inception was -37.83%, smaller than the maximum NQCRX drawdown of -57.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLCAX and NQCRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RLCAX	NQCRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.83%	-57.85%	+20.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.30%	-6.07%	-0.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.71%	-17.21%	-0.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.73%	-17.61%	-17.12%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.83%	-41.84%	+4.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.76%	+0.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.17%	-10.01%	+2.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.58%	1.62%	-0.04%

Volatility

RLCAX vs. NQCRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Disciplined Value Fund (RLCAX) is 3.02%, while Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund (NQCRX) has a volatility of 3.84%. This indicates that RLCAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NQCRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RLCAX	NQCRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.02%	3.84%	-0.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.90%	9.51%	-1.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.73%	12.37%	-1.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.44%	15.60%	+7.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.71%	18.93%	+2.78%

RLCAX vs. NQCRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RLCAX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than NQCRX's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

RLCAX vs. NQCRX - Dividend Comparison

RLCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.14%, more than NQCRX's 6.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NQCRX Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund	6.29%	7.30%	6.82%	2.22%	4.63%	20.85%	17.95%	26.88%	34.12%	27.42%	10.74%	61.01%
RLCAX Columbia Disciplined Value Fund	10.14%	11.76%	11.66%	7.59%	13.00%	31.01%	1.54%	10.78%	11.88%	5.35%	1.53%	6.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RLCAX and NQCRX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, RLCAX and NQCRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, RLCAX or NQCRX?

NQCRX has higher volatility (3.84%) compared to RLCAX (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RLCAX dropped -37.83% vs NQCRX's -57.85%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NQCRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 2.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.