RKNG vs. XMAG
RKNG (Defiance Retail Kings ETF) and XMAG (Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RKNG is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while XMAG is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the BITA US 500 ex Magnificent 7 Index. RKNG is actively managed, while XMAG is passively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RKNG charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMAG.
Performance
RKNG vs. XMAG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RKNG
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 12.39%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XMAG
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 5.41%
- YTD
- 12.54%
- 6M
- 13.14%
- 1Y
- 24.36%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RKNG vs. XMAG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RKNG Defiance Retail Kings ETF | 16.03% |
XMAG Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF | 10.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between RKNG and XMAG is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2026 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RKNG vs. XMAG — Risk / Return Rank
RKNG
XMAG
RKNG vs. XMAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Retail Kings ETF (RKNG) and Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RKNG | XMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 1.10 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
RKNG vs. XMAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RKNG drawdown since its inception was -34.21%, which is greater than XMAG's maximum drawdown of -16.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RKNG and XMAG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RKNG | XMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.21% | -16.17% | -18.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.72% | -0.17% | -2.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.80% | -2.12% | -10.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.63% | — |
Volatility
RKNG vs. XMAG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RKNG | XMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.80% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.64% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.62% | 11.10% | +47.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.62% | 15.10% | +43.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.62% | 15.10% | +43.52% |
RKNG vs. XMAG - Expense Ratio Comparison
RKNG has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than XMAG's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
RKNG vs. XMAG - Dividend Comparison
RKNG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XMAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
RKNG Defiance Retail Kings ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMAG Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF | 0.46% | 0.51% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RKNG and XMAG have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XMAG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XMAG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for RKNG.
XMAG has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.00% for RKNG.
RKNG is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while XMAG is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for RKNG and 0.35% for XMAG.
Find the right allocation for RKNG and XMAG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer