RKNG vs. BEDZ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

RKNG (Defiance Retail Kings ETF) and BEDZ (AdvisorShares Hotel ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RKNG charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BEDZ.

Performance

RKNG vs. BEDZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Retail Kings ETF (RKNG) and AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

RKNG

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 12.39%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BEDZ

• 1D: 1.93%
• 1M: 6.21%
• YTD: 6.84%
• 6M: 12.33%
• 1Y: 20.83%
• 3Y*: 14.09%
• 5Y*: 7.60%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RKNG vs. BEDZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
RKNG Defiance Retail Kings ETF	16.03%
BEDZ AdvisorShares Hotel ETF	7.77%

Correlation

The correlation between RKNG and BEDZ is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2026	0.33

Return for Risk

RKNG vs. BEDZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BEDZ

BEDZ Risk / Return Rank: 30
BEDZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
BEDZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
BEDZ Omega Ratio Rank: 27
BEDZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
BEDZ Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RKNG vs. BEDZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Retail Kings ETF (RKNG) and AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RKNG	BEDZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.03	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.31	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.86	0.33	+0.53

Drawdowns

RKNG vs. BEDZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RKNG drawdown since its inception was -34.21%, which is greater than BEDZ's maximum drawdown of -29.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RKNG and BEDZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	RKNG	BEDZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.21%	-29.70%	-4.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.06%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-28.31%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.70%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.72%	0.00%	-2.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.80%	-8.08%	-4.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.15%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RKNG	BEDZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.19%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	15.21%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	58.62%	20.35%	+38.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	58.62%	24.90%	+33.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	58.62%	24.85%	+33.77%

RKNG vs. BEDZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RKNG has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BEDZ's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

RKNG vs. BEDZ - Dividend Comparison

RKNG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BEDZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BEDZ AdvisorShares Hotel ETF	2.16%	2.31%	0.00%	1.67%	0.21%	0.36%
RKNG Defiance Retail Kings ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RKNG and BEDZ in my portfolio?

RKNG and BEDZ have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RKNG or BEDZ?

On fees, RKNG is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RKNG or BEDZ?

RKNG is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BEDZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RKNG or BEDZ?

BEDZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.16%, compared with 0.00% for RKNG.

What is the main difference between RKNG and BEDZ?

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for RKNG and 0.99% for BEDZ.