PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RJVI vs. XAGG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RJVI vs. XAGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RJ Eagle Vertical Income ETF (RJVI) and Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF (XAGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RJVI achieves a 1.83% return, which is significantly lower than XAGG's 2.22% return.


RJVI

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.02%
YTD
1.83%
6M
1.96%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XAGG

1D
0.15%
1M
0.66%
YTD
2.22%
6M
2.32%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RJVI vs. XAGG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RJVI and XAGG is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2025

0.63

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RJVI vs. XAGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RJ Eagle Vertical Income ETF (RJVI) and Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF (XAGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RJVI vs. XAGG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RJVI vs. XAGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RJVI drawdown since its inception was -3.12%, which is greater than XAGG's maximum drawdown of -2.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RJVI and XAGG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RJVIXAGGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.12%

-2.88%

-0.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

-0.39%

-0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.03%

-0.56%

-0.47%

Volatility

RJVI vs. XAGG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RJVIXAGGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.17%

3.51%

+0.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.17%

3.51%

+0.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.17%

3.51%

+0.66%

RJVI vs. XAGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

RJVI has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than XAGG's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

RJVI vs. XAGG - Dividend Comparison

RJVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, less than XAGG's 3.85% yield.


PositionTTM2025
RJVI
RJ Eagle Vertical Income ETF
2.61%0.93%
XAGG
Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF
3.85%1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


RJVI and XAGG have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XAGG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XAGG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for RJVI.

XAGG has the higher dividend yield at 3.85%, compared with 2.61% for RJVI.

They also come from different issuers: Carillon Tower Advisers and Eaton Vance. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for RJVI and 0.50% for XAGG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RJVI and XAGG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer