RIZF.DE vs. XUCD.DE

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

RIZF.DE (Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD) and XUCD.DE (Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - RIZF.DE tracks the Solactive RIZE ETF Sustainable Future of Food Index while XUCD.DE tracks the MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary 20/35 Custom. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RIZF.DE returned -8.50%/yr vs 7.23%/yr for XUCD.DE. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RIZF.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XUCD.DE.

Performance

RIZF.DE vs. XUCD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (RIZF.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D (XUCD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIZF.DE achieves a 6.27% return, which is significantly higher than XUCD.DE's 2.96% return.

RIZF.DE

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 2.06%
• 6M: 0.53%
• YTD: 6.27%
• 1Y: -2.41%
• 3Y*: -4.72%
• 5Y*: -8.50%
• 10Y*: —

XUCD.DE

• 1D: 1.88%
• 1M: 1.53%
• 6M: 0.50%
• YTD: 2.96%
• 1Y: 11.47%
• 3Y*: 13.18%
• 5Y*: 7.23%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIZF.DE vs. XUCD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
RIZF.DE Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD	6.27%	-13.70%	-1.88%	-4.62%	-22.47%	9.35%	6.48%
XUCD.DE Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D	2.96%	-5.02%	38.90%	38.83%	-34.77%	32.20%	5.15%

Correlation

The correlation between RIZF.DE and XUCD.DE is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2020	0.56

The correlation between RIZF.DE and XUCD.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RIZF.DE vs. XUCD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIZF.DE

RIZF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9
RIZF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
RIZF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
RIZF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8
RIZF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
RIZF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9

XUCD.DE

XUCD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 21
XUCD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
XUCD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
XUCD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 19
XUCD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
XUCD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIZF.DE vs. XUCD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (RIZF.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D (XUCD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RIZF.DE	XUCD.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.02	0.61	-0.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.08	0.97	-0.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.12	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.02	0.82	-0.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.05	2.20	-2.24

RIZF.DE vs. XUCD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIZF.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the XUCD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIZF.DE and XUCD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RIZF.DE vs. XUCD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIZF.DE drawdown since its inception was -45.32%, which is greater than XUCD.DE's maximum drawdown of -38.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIZF.DE and XUCD.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	RIZF.DE	XUCD.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.32%	-38.43%	-6.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.34%	-13.88%	-1.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.69%	-30.82%	+5.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.32%	-38.43%	-6.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-38.58%	-6.95%	-31.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.65%	-10.64%	-14.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.92%	5.21%	+2.71%

Volatility

RIZF.DE vs. XUCD.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (RIZF.DE) is 4.99%, while Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D (XUCD.DE) has a volatility of 6.36%. This indicates that RIZF.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XUCD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RIZF.DE	XUCD.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.99%	6.36%	-1.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.32%	14.11%	-2.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.03%	18.64%	-2.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.84%	22.15%	-5.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.42%	22.55%	-6.13%

RIZF.DE vs. XUCD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

RIZF.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XUCD.DE's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

RIZF.DE vs. XUCD.DE - Dividend Comparison

RIZF.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XUCD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
RIZF.DE Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XUCD.DE Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D	0.44%	0.46%	0.40%	0.60%	0.91%	0.35%	0.59%	0.81%	0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RIZF.DE and XUCD.DE in my portfolio?

RIZF.DE and XUCD.DE have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RIZF.DE or XUCD.DE?

On fees, XUCD.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RIZF.DE or XUCD.DE?

XUCD.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for RIZF.DE.

What is the main difference between RIZF.DE and XUCD.DE?

RIZF.DE tracks Solactive RIZE ETF Sustainable Future of Food Index, while XUCD.DE tracks MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary 20/35 Custom. They also come from different issuers: Rize ETF and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for RIZF.DE and 0.12% for XUCD.DE.