RIZF.DE vs. XDWS.DE
RIZF.DE (Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD) and XDWS.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - RIZF.DE tracks the Solactive RIZE ETF Sustainable Future of Food Index while XDWS.DE tracks the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RIZF.DE returned -8.50%/yr vs 5.29%/yr for XDWS.DE. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RIZF.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWS.DE.
Performance
RIZF.DE vs. XDWS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RIZF.DE achieves a 6.27% return, which is significantly lower than XDWS.DE's 9.25% return.
RIZF.DE
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 2.06%
- 6M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 6.27%
- 1Y
- -2.41%
- 3Y*
- -4.72%
- 5Y*
- -8.50%
- 10Y*
- —
XDWS.DE
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 5.17%
- YTD
- 9.25%
- 1Y
- 9.32%
- 3Y*
- 5.74%
- 5Y*
- 5.29%
- 10Y*
- 5.29%
RIZF.DE vs. XDWS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIZF.DE Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD | 6.27% | -13.70% | -1.88% | -4.62% | -22.47% | 9.35% | 6.48% |
XDWS.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C | 9.25% | -3.35% | 12.59% | -1.54% | -0.07% | 22.38% | 0.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between RIZF.DE and XDWS.DE is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2020 | 0.45 |
The correlation between RIZF.DE and XDWS.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RIZF.DE vs. XDWS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
RIZF.DE
XDWS.DE
RIZF.DE vs. XDWS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (RIZF.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C (XDWS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RIZF.DE | XDWS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.13 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | 1.06 | -1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.05 | 2.29 | -2.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RIZF.DE vs. XDWS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIZF.DE drawdown since its inception was -45.32%, which is greater than XDWS.DE's maximum drawdown of -36.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIZF.DE and XDWS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RIZF.DE | XDWS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.32% | -36.24% | -9.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.34% | -8.79% | -6.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.69% | -11.90% | -13.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.32% | -12.45% | -32.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.58% | -3.34% | -35.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.65% | -8.04% | -16.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.92% | 4.05% | +3.87% |
Volatility
RIZF.DE vs. XDWS.DE - Volatility Comparison
Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (RIZF.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.99% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C (XDWS.DE) at 4.65%. This indicates that RIZF.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RIZF.DE | XDWS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.99% | 4.65% | +0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.32% | 10.74% | +0.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.03% | 12.75% | +3.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.84% | 11.52% | +5.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.42% | 13.35% | +3.07% |
RIZF.DE vs. XDWS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
RIZF.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XDWS.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
RIZF.DE vs. XDWS.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither RIZF.DE nor XDWS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
RIZF.DE and XDWS.DE have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDWS.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDWS.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for RIZF.DE.
RIZF.DE tracks Solactive RIZE ETF Sustainable Future of Food Index, while XDWS.DE tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. They also come from different issuers: Rize ETF and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for RIZF.DE and 0.25% for XDWS.DE.
Find the right allocation for RIZF.DE and XDWS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer