RIVSX vs. FTMSX
RIVSX (River Oak Discovery Fund) and FTMSX (Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Micro-Cap Equity Fund) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, RIVSX returned 9.30%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for FTMSX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RIVSX charges 1.18%/yr vs 2.30%/yr for FTMSX.
Performance
RIVSX vs. FTMSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RIVSX achieves a 33.23% return, which is significantly higher than FTMSX's 31.22% return.
RIVSX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.85%
- 6M
- 24.74%
- YTD
- 33.23%
- 1Y
- 46.92%
- 3Y*
- 17.01%
- 5Y*
- 9.30%
- 10Y*
- 12.02%
FTMSX
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 5.11%
- 6M
- 23.17%
- YTD
- 31.22%
- 1Y
- 40.39%
- 3Y*
- 11.99%
- 5Y*
- 0.86%
- 10Y*
- —
RIVSX vs. FTMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIVSX River Oak Discovery Fund | 33.23% | 9.11% | 4.42% | 8.18% | -14.53% | 24.78% | 29.00% | 29.62% |
FTMSX Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Micro-Cap Equity Fund | 31.22% | 0.30% | 3.88% | 13.11% | -31.07% | 37.45% | 15.58% | 17.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between RIVSX and FTMSX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2019 | 0.82 |
The correlation between RIVSX and FTMSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RIVSX vs. FTMSX — Risk / Return Rank
RIVSX
FTMSX
RIVSX vs. FTMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for River Oak Discovery Fund (RIVSX) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Micro-Cap Equity Fund (FTMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RIVSX | FTMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.24 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.96 | 2.13 | +2.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.32 | 7.88 | +9.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RIVSX vs. FTMSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIVSX drawdown since its inception was -60.61%, which is greater than FTMSX's maximum drawdown of -53.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIVSX and FTMSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RIVSX | FTMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.61% | -53.12% | -7.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.11% | -17.52% | +8.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.52% | -35.01% | +10.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.75% | -48.67% | +22.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.77% | -2.55% | -0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.44% | -22.08% | +11.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | 4.74% | -2.11% |
Volatility
RIVSX vs. FTMSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for River Oak Discovery Fund (RIVSX) is 5.47%, while Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Micro-Cap Equity Fund (FTMSX) has a volatility of 7.53%. This indicates that RIVSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RIVSX | FTMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.47% | 7.53% | -2.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.30% | 17.98% | -4.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.10% | 25.86% | -6.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.37% | 28.14% | -7.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.81% | 30.47% | -8.66% |
RIVSX vs. FTMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RIVSX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FTMSX's 2.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
RIVSX vs. FTMSX - Dividend Comparison
RIVSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, while FTMSX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTMSX Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Micro-Cap Equity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.27% | 0.37% | 4.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RIVSX River Oak Discovery Fund | 0.22% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.15% | 16.84% | 14.54% | 3.81% | 17.54% | 5.48% | 0.00% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RIVSX and FTMSX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTMSX has higher volatility (7.53%) compared to RIVSX (5.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIVSX dropped -60.61% vs FTMSX's -53.12%.
RIVSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RIVSX and FTMSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer