RIVSX vs. FSCTX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

RIVSX (River Oak Discovery Fund) and FSCTX (Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class M) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, RIVSX returned 12.48%/yr vs 9.74%/yr for FSCTX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RIVSX charges 1.18%/yr vs 1.46%/yr for FSCTX.

Performance

RIVSX vs. FSCTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in River Oak Discovery Fund (RIVSX) and Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class M (FSCTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIVSX achieves a 34.61% return, which is significantly higher than FSCTX's 22.62% return. Over the past 10 years, RIVSX has outperformed FSCTX with an annualized return of 12.48%, while FSCTX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.74% annualized return.

RIVSX

• 1D: 1.66%
• 1M: 4.20%
• YTD: 34.61%
• 6M: 32.22%
• 1Y: 56.93%
• 3Y*: 16.93%
• 5Y*: 9.87%
• 10Y*: 12.48%

FSCTX

• 1D: 1.84%
• 1M: 4.77%
• YTD: 22.62%
• 6M: 19.28%
• 1Y: 40.08%
• 3Y*: 12.99%
• 5Y*: 6.56%
• 10Y*: 9.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIVSX vs. FSCTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RIVSX River Oak Discovery Fund	34.61%	9.11%	4.42%	8.18%	-14.53%	24.78%	29.00%	30.36%	-13.72%	11.33%
FSCTX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class M	22.62%	11.57%	-4.53%	18.02%	-20.91%	30.90%	16.86%	32.04%	-16.52%	13.51%

Correlation

The correlation between RIVSX and FSCTX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2006	0.89

The correlation between RIVSX and FSCTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RIVSX vs. FSCTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIVSX

RIVSX Risk / Return Rank: 92
RIVSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
RIVSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
RIVSX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
RIVSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
RIVSX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

FSCTX

FSCTX Risk / Return Rank: 74
FSCTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
FSCTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FSCTX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
FSCTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FSCTX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIVSX vs. FSCTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for River Oak Discovery Fund (RIVSX) and Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class M (FSCTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RIVSX	FSCTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.98	2.21	+0.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.98	3.13	+0.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.37	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.20	4.32	+1.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.82	16.11	+5.71

RIVSX vs. FSCTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIVSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.98, which is higher than the FSCTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIVSX and FSCTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RIVSX vs. FSCTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIVSX drawdown since its inception was -60.61%, which is greater than FSCTX's maximum drawdown of -50.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIVSX and FSCTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RIVSX	FSCTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.61%	-50.42%	-10.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.11%	-9.34%	+0.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.52%	-36.64%	+12.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.75%	-36.64%	+10.89%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.45%	-40.49%	-0.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.46%	-11.88%	+1.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.58%	2.50%	+0.08%

Volatility

RIVSX vs. FSCTX - Volatility Comparison

River Oak Discovery Fund (RIVSX) and Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class M (FSCTX) have volatilities of 6.69% and 6.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RIVSX	FSCTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.69%	6.46%	+0.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.09%	13.77%	-0.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.98%	18.24%	+0.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.34%	22.43%	-2.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.95%	22.13%	-0.18%

RIVSX vs. FSCTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RIVSX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FSCTX's 1.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

RIVSX vs. FSCTX - Dividend Comparison

RIVSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than FSCTX's 1.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSCTX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class M	1.82%	2.24%	0.00%	1.55%	6.07%	12.11%	2.99%	4.38%	16.01%	15.16%	2.30%	8.94%
RIVSX River Oak Discovery Fund	0.21%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.15%	16.84%	14.54%	3.81%	17.54%	5.48%	0.00%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RIVSX and FSCTX in my portfolio?

RIVSX and FSCTX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RIVSX or FSCTX?

RIVSX has higher volatility (6.69%) compared to FSCTX (6.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIVSX dropped -60.61% vs FSCTX's -50.42%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RIVSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.