RIVN vs. WGMI

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RIVN (Rivian Automotive, Inc.) is a stock, while WGMI (Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF) is Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Valkyrie. Over the past 3 years, RIVN returned 3.24%/yr vs 76.50%/yr for WGMI. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RIVN vs. WGMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rivian Automotive, Inc. (RIVN) and Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIVN achieves a -24.45% return, which is significantly lower than WGMI's 85.47% return.

RIVN

• 1D: -1.39%
• 1M: 4.71%
• YTD: -24.45%
• 6M: -29.70%
• 1Y: 9.08%
• 3Y*: 3.24%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WGMI

• 1D: -1.39%
• 1M: 14.61%
• YTD: 85.47%
• 6M: 70.99%
• 1Y: 292.37%
• 3Y*: 76.50%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIVN vs. WGMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
RIVN Rivian Automotive, Inc.	-24.45%	48.20%	-43.31%	27.29%	-68.42%
WGMI Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF	85.47%	72.47%	23.54%	304.08%	-82.94%

Correlation

The correlation between RIVN and WGMI is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2022	0.47

The correlation between RIVN and WGMI shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.47 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RIVN vs. WGMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIVN

RIVN Risk / Return Rank: 48
RIVN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
RIVN Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
RIVN Omega Ratio Rank: 48
RIVN Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
RIVN Martin Ratio Rank: 48

WGMI

WGMI Risk / Return Rank: 82
WGMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
WGMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
WGMI Omega Ratio Rank: 75
WGMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
WGMI Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIVN vs. WGMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rivian Automotive, Inc. (RIVN) and Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RIVN	WGMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.14	3.84	-3.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.77	3.41	-2.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.42	-0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.21	5.78	-5.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.41	11.70	-11.29

RIVN vs. WGMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIVN Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the WGMI Sharpe Ratio of 3.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIVN and WGMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RIVN vs. WGMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIVN drawdown since its inception was -95.12%, which is greater than WGMI's maximum drawdown of -85.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIVN and WGMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	RIVN	WGMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.12%	-85.76%	-9.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.54%	-50.94%	+8.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-69.61%	-62.79%	-6.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-91.34%	-1.55%	-89.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-86.35%	-42.43%	-43.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	22.09%	25.12%	-3.03%

Volatility

RIVN vs. WGMI - Volatility Comparison

Rivian Automotive, Inc. (RIVN) has a higher volatility of 23.17% compared to Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI) at 20.98%. This indicates that RIVN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WGMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RIVN	WGMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.17%	20.98%	+2.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.83%	55.32%	-8.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	65.95%	76.84%	-10.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	77.49%	81.51%	-4.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	77.49%	81.51%	-4.02%

Dividends

RIVN vs. WGMI - Dividend Comparison

Neither RIVN nor WGMI has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
RIVN Rivian Automotive, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WGMI Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.22%	0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RIVN and WGMI in my portfolio?

RIVN and WGMI have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RIVN or WGMI?

RIVN has higher volatility (23.17%) compared to WGMI (20.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIVN dropped -95.12% vs WGMI's -85.76%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WGMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.84 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.