PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RIVN vs. COPJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RIVN vs. COPJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rivian Automotive, Inc. (RIVN) and Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIVN achieves a -24.45% return, which is significantly lower than COPJ's 0.31% return.


RIVN

1D
-1.39%
1M
4.71%
YTD
-24.45%
6M
-29.70%
1Y
9.08%
3Y*
3.24%
5Y*
10Y*

COPJ

1D
-5.08%
1M
-6.08%
YTD
0.31%
6M
1.57%
1Y
91.12%
3Y*
38.95%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIVN vs. COPJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
RIVN
Rivian Automotive, Inc.
-24.45%48.20%-43.31%19.03%
COPJ
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
0.31%140.63%11.07%-6.47%

Correlation

The correlation between RIVN and COPJ is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2023

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RIVN vs. COPJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIVN
RIVN Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
RIVN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIVN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIVN Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
RIVN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIVN Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

COPJ
COPJ Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
COPJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COPJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
COPJ Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
COPJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
COPJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIVN vs. COPJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rivian Automotive, Inc. (RIVN) and Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RIVNCOPJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.33

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.21

2.84

-2.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.41

7.73

-7.32

RIVN vs. COPJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIVN Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the COPJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIVN and COPJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RIVN vs. COPJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIVN drawdown since its inception was -95.12%, which is greater than COPJ's maximum drawdown of -32.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIVN and COPJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RIVNCOPJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.12%

-32.28%

-62.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.54%

-32.28%

-10.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.61%

-32.28%

-37.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.34%

-23.33%

-68.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.35%

-12.01%

-74.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.09%

11.82%

+10.27%

Volatility

RIVN vs. COPJ - Volatility Comparison

Rivian Automotive, Inc. (RIVN) has a higher volatility of 23.17% compared to Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ) at 19.61%. This indicates that RIVN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COPJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RIVNCOPJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.17%

19.61%

+3.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.83%

38.85%

+7.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.95%

45.16%

+20.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

77.49%

35.68%

+41.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

77.49%

35.68%

+41.81%

Dividends

RIVN vs. COPJ - Dividend Comparison

RIVN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COPJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.54%.


PositionTTM202520242023
COPJ
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
11.54%11.57%11.64%2.48%
RIVN
Rivian Automotive, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RIVN and COPJ have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RIVN has higher volatility (23.17%) compared to COPJ (19.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIVN dropped -95.12% vs COPJ's -32.28%.

COPJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RIVN and COPJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer