PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RIUS.L vs. IWVG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RIUS.L vs. IWVG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in L&G US ESG Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (RIUS.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

RIUS.L is traded in USD, while IWVG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IWVG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIUS.L achieves a 9.48% return, which is significantly lower than IWVG.L's 29.21% return.


RIUS.L

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.07%
6M
9.26%
YTD
9.48%
1Y
21.59%
3Y*
20.56%
5Y*
12.67%
10Y*

IWVG.L

1D
-1.38%
1M
-4.12%
6M
25.30%
YTD
29.21%
1Y
56.72%
3Y*
26.65%
5Y*
16.55%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIUS.L vs. IWVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
RIUS.L
L&G US ESG Paris Aligned UCITS ETF
9.48%18.88%26.31%30.95%-23.30%27.45%25.19%2.72%
IWVG.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
29.21%41.17%4.80%19.04%-9.76%20.14%-4.01%2.31%

Correlation

The correlation between RIUS.L and IWVG.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2019

0.69

The correlation between RIUS.L and IWVG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RIUS.L vs. IWVG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIUS.L
RIUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
RIUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
RIUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

IWVG.L
IWVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
IWVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIUS.L vs. IWVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G US ESG Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (RIUS.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RIUS.LIWVG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.60

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

6.55

-4.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.33

23.13

-14.79

RIUS.L vs. IWVG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIUS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the IWVG.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIUS.L and IWVG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RIUS.L vs. IWVG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIUS.L drawdown since its inception was -33.35%, smaller than the maximum IWVG.L drawdown of -35.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIUS.L and IWVG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RIUS.LIWVG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.35%

-35.79%

+2.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.68%

-8.62%

-2.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.30%

-14.64%

-5.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.59%

-26.94%

-0.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-4.24%

+3.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.30%

-6.64%

+0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

2.45%

+0.23%

Volatility

RIUS.L vs. IWVG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G US ESG Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (RIUS.L) is 3.68%, while iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVG.L) has a volatility of 6.03%. This indicates that RIUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWVG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RIUS.LIWVG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.68%

6.03%

-2.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.21%

13.95%

-2.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.05%

16.24%

-2.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.35%

15.95%

+1.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.16%

17.66%

+1.50%

RIUS.L vs. IWVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

RIUS.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IWVG.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

RIUS.L vs. IWVG.L - Dividend Comparison

RIUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWVG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IWVG.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.93%2.48%3.12%3.22%3.11%2.61%2.37%2.90%2.48%
RIUS.L
L&G US ESG Paris Aligned UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RIUS.L and IWVG.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RIUS.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RIUS.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IWVG.L.

RIUS.L tracks L&G US ESG Paris Aligned UCITS ETF, while IWVG.L tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. They also come from different issuers: L&G and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for RIUS.L and 0.30% for IWVG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RIUS.L and IWVG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer