RITA vs. MNY.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ETFB Green SRI REITs ETF (RITA) and Purpose Cash Management Fund (MNY.TO).

RITA and MNY.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RITA is a passively managed fund by ETFB that tracks the performance of the FTSE EPRA Nareit IdealRatings Developed REITs Islamic Green Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Dec 8, 2021. MNY.TO is an actively managed fund by Purpose Investments. It was launched on Sep 14, 2022.

Performance

RITA vs. MNY.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETFB Green SRI REITs ETF (RITA) and Purpose Cash Management Fund (MNY.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RITA vs. MNY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
RITA ETFB Green SRI REITs ETF	0.36%	3.93%	1.93%	9.66%	-6.92%
MNY.TO Purpose Cash Management Fund	-0.75%	7.97%	-3.58%	7.42%	-1.37%

Different Trading Currencies

RITA is traded in USD, while MNY.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the MNY.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RITA achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly higher than MNY.TO's -0.75% return.

RITA

• 1D: 2.00%
• 1M: -6.36%
• YTD: 0.36%
• 6M: -0.19%
• 1Y: 3.08%
• 3Y*: 4.07%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MNY.TO

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: -1.66%
• YTD: -0.75%
• 6M: 1.40%
• 1Y: 6.26%
• 3Y*: 3.07%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RITA vs. MNY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RITA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MNY.TO's 0.22% expense ratio.

RITA

ETFB Green SRI REITs ETF

MNY.TO

Purpose Cash Management Fund

Return for Risk

RITA vs. MNY.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RITA

RITA Risk / Return Rank: 18
RITA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
RITA Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
RITA Omega Ratio Rank: 16
RITA Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
RITA Martin Ratio Rank: 21

MNY.TO

MNY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 100
MNY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MNY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
MNY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 100
MNY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MNY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RITA vs. MNY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFB Green SRI REITs ETF (RITA) and Purpose Cash Management Fund (MNY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RITA	MNY.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.19	1.20	-1.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.38	1.99	-1.61
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.23	-0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.29	2.01	-1.73
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.21	4.43	-3.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RITA vs. MNY.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RITA Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is lower than the MNY.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RITA and MNY.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RITA	MNY.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19	1.20	-1.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.18	0.44	-0.61

Correlation

The correlation between RITA and MNY.TO is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

RITA vs. MNY.TO - Dividend Comparison

RITA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, more than MNY.TO's 2.67% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
RITA ETFB Green SRI REITs ETF	2.85%	2.50%	3.12%	3.25%	2.41%	0.21%
MNY.TO Purpose Cash Management Fund	2.67%	2.93%	4.71%	4.85%	1.47%	0.00%

Drawdowns

RITA vs. MNY.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RITA drawdown since its inception was -35.92%, which is greater than MNY.TO's maximum drawdown of -6.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RITA and MNY.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	RITA	MNY.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.92%	-0.24%	-35.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.27%	-0.04%	-12.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.58%	0.00%	-17.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.97%	0.00%	-20.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.92%	0.00%	+2.92%

Volatility

RITA vs. MNY.TO - Volatility Comparison

ETFB Green SRI REITs ETF (RITA) has a higher volatility of 5.03% compared to Purpose Cash Management Fund (MNY.TO) at 1.36%. This indicates that RITA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RITA	MNY.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.03%	1.36%	+3.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.78%	3.34%	+5.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.98%	5.24%	+10.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.87%	5.97%	+11.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.87%	5.97%	+11.90%