RISE vs. EMXC
RISE (Pictet Emerging Markets Rising Economies ETF) and EMXC (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. RISE is actively managed, while EMXC is passively managed. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RISE charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EMXC.
Performance
RISE vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RISE
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -2.37%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMXC
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -7.48%
- 6M
- 25.05%
- YTD
- 31.84%
- 1Y
- 54.12%
- 3Y*
- 24.08%
- 5Y*
- 11.85%
- 10Y*
- —
RISE vs. EMXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RISE Pictet Emerging Markets Rising Economies ETF | -6.58% |
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 6.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between RISE and EMXC is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RISE vs. EMXC — Risk / Return Rank
RISE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EMXC
RISE vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pictet Emerging Markets Rising Economies ETF (RISE) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RISE | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.38 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.77 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.87 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RISE vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RISE drawdown since its inception was -9.58%, smaller than the maximum EMXC drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RISE and EMXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RISE | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.58% | -42.81% | +33.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.94% | -10.55% | +3.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.30% | -10.13% | +4.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.22% | — |
Volatility
RISE vs. EMXC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RISE | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.36% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 24.77% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.56% | 26.42% | -7.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.56% | 18.74% | -0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.56% | 20.37% | -1.81% |
RISE vs. EMXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
RISE has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than EMXC's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
RISE vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison
RISE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than EMXC's 2.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 2.02% | 2.82% | 2.69% | 1.83% | 2.85% | 1.78% | 1.45% | 3.25% | 2.63% | 0.99% |
RISE Pictet Emerging Markets Rising Economies ETF | 0.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RISE and EMXC have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EMXC is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMXC is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for RISE.
EMXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.02%, compared with 0.49% for RISE.
They also come from different issuers: Pictet and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for RISE and 0.49% for EMXC.
Find the right allocation for RISE and EMXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer