RISE.L vs. CSP1.L
RISE.L (iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF) and CSP1.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RISE.L is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA Gbl HY Constnd TR USD, while CSP1.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RISE.L returned 4.64%/yr vs 14.94%/yr for CSP1.L. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RISE.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CSP1.L.
Performance
RISE.L vs. CSP1.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RISE.L achieves a 1.29% return, which is significantly lower than CSP1.L's 10.55% return.
RISE.L
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 1.50%
- 1Y
- 9.82%
- 3Y*
- 6.74%
- 5Y*
- 4.64%
- 10Y*
- —
CSP1.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 5.54%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 10.48%
- 1Y
- 29.13%
- 3Y*
- 19.02%
- 5Y*
- 14.94%
- 10Y*
- 16.07%
RISE.L vs. CSP1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RISE.L iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 1.29% | 5.86% | 5.76% | 7.62% | -3.13% | 4.04% | 14.09% | 13.14% | 2.07% | 3.75% |
CSP1.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.55% | 9.37% | 27.35% | 19.79% | -9.05% | 31.07% | 13.65% | 26.42% | 0.01% | 10.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between RISE.L and CSP1.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2016 | 0.52 |
The correlation between RISE.L and CSP1.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
RISE.L vs. CSP1.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RISE.L
CSP1.L
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
RISE.L
CSP1.L
Basic Materials
RISE.L
-
CSP1.L
Communication Services
RISE.L
-
CSP1.L
Consumer Cyclical
RISE.L
-
CSP1.L
Consumer Defensive
RISE.L
-
CSP1.L
Energy
RISE.L
-
CSP1.L
Healthcare
RISE.L
-
CSP1.L
Industrials
RISE.L
-
CSP1.L
Real Estate
RISE.L
-
CSP1.L
Technology
RISE.L
-
CSP1.L
Utilities
RISE.L
-
CSP1.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RISE.L vs. CSP1.L — Risk / Return Rank
RISE.L
CSP1.L
RISE.L vs. CSP1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (RISE.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RISE.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.51 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.42 | 4.07 | -0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.87 | 14.99 | -4.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RISE.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | 2.73 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 1.04 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 1.09 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
RISE.L vs. CSP1.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RISE.L drawdown since its inception was -14.31%, smaller than the maximum CSP1.L drawdown of -25.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RISE.L and CSP1.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RISE.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.31% | -25.48% | +11.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.86% | -7.12% | +4.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.65% | -20.77% | +14.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.05% | -20.77% | +10.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.25% | -0.24% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.24% | -3.32% | +1.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.90% | 1.94% | -1.04% |
Volatility
RISE.L vs. CSP1.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (RISE.L) is 1.24%, while iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) has a volatility of 2.62%. This indicates that RISE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSP1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RISE.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.24% | 2.62% | -1.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.62% | 7.16% | -3.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.90% | 10.62% | -5.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.66% | 14.31% | -7.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.83% | 15.57% | -6.74% |
RISE.L vs. CSP1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
RISE.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CSP1.L's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
RISE.L vs. CSP1.L - Dividend Comparison
RISE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.29%, while CSP1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSP1.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RISE.L iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 8.29% | 6.61% | 6.89% | 6.13% | 5.06% | 4.52% | 4.96% | 5.81% | 6.42% | 5.91% | 2.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RISE.L and CSP1.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSP1.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSP1.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RISE.L.
RISE.L is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while CSP1.L is S&P 500. RISE.L tracks ICE BofA Gbl HY Constnd TR USD, while CSP1.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RISE.L and 0.07% for CSP1.L.
Find the right allocation for RISE.L and CSP1.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer