RIPIX vs. SGFFX
RIPIX (Royce International Premier Fund Institutional Class) and SGFFX (Sparrow Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, RIPIX returned -3.05%/yr vs 7.09%/yr for SGFFX. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RIPIX charges 1.04%/yr vs 1.81%/yr for SGFFX.
Performance
RIPIX vs. SGFFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RIPIX achieves a 4.31% return, which is significantly higher than SGFFX's 3.39% return.
RIPIX
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 2.83%
- YTD
- 4.31%
- 6M
- 5.00%
- 1Y
- 3.61%
- 3Y*
- 2.98%
- 5Y*
- -3.05%
- 10Y*
- —
SGFFX
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 4.21%
- YTD
- 3.39%
- 6M
- 2.40%
- 1Y
- 12.89%
- 3Y*
- 20.29%
- 5Y*
- 7.09%
- 10Y*
- 16.11%
RIPIX vs. SGFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIPIX Royce International Premier Fund Institutional Class | 4.31% | 9.89% | -7.04% | 8.14% | -26.99% | 6.22% | 16.11% | 34.69% | -12.52% |
SGFFX Sparrow Growth Fund | 3.39% | 14.31% | 34.81% | 17.02% | -23.36% | -11.00% | 97.83% | 27.24% | -10.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between RIPIX and SGFFX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2018 | 0.52 |
The correlation between RIPIX and SGFFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RIPIX vs. SGFFX — Risk / Return Rank
RIPIX
SGFFX
RIPIX vs. SGFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royce International Premier Fund Institutional Class (RIPIX) and Sparrow Growth Fund (SGFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RIPIX | SGFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.18 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.19 | 0.87 | -0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.47 | 2.89 | -2.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RIPIX | SGFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 | 1.03 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.20 | 0.26 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.28 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
RIPIX vs. SGFFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIPIX drawdown since its inception was -41.89%, smaller than the maximum SGFFX drawdown of -62.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIPIX and SGFFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RIPIX | SGFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.89% | -62.10% | +20.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.38% | -15.33% | -1.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.33% | -39.29% | +21.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.89% | -40.24% | -1.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.11% | -16.02% | -7.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.01% | -22.17% | +4.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.68% | 4.58% | +2.10% |
Volatility
RIPIX vs. SGFFX - Volatility Comparison
Royce International Premier Fund Institutional Class (RIPIX) has a higher volatility of 3.15% compared to Sparrow Growth Fund (SGFFX) at 2.65%. This indicates that RIPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RIPIX | SGFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.15% | 2.65% | +0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.56% | 9.82% | +0.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.08% | 12.94% | +0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.40% | 27.12% | -11.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.14% | 27.98% | -11.84% |
RIPIX vs. SGFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RIPIX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SGFFX's 1.81% expense ratio.
Dividends
RIPIX vs. SGFFX - Dividend Comparison
RIPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, while SGFFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIPIX Royce International Premier Fund Institutional Class | 1.40% | 1.46% | 5.66% | 3.09% | 3.87% | 5.02% | 0.36% | 0.58% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SGFFX Sparrow Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 18.67% | 0.00% | 0.67% | 1.33% | 5.84% | 7.33% | 0.00% | 2.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RIPIX and SGFFX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RIPIX has higher volatility (3.15%) compared to SGFFX (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIPIX dropped -41.89% vs SGFFX's -62.10%.
SGFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RIPIX and SGFFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer