RIPIX vs. SGFFX
RIPIX (Royce International Premier Fund Institutional Class) and SGFFX (Sparrow Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, RIPIX returned -4.60%/yr vs 5.06%/yr for SGFFX. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RIPIX charges 1.04%/yr vs 1.81%/yr for SGFFX.
Performance
RIPIX vs. SGFFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RIPIX achieves a 1.12% return, which is significantly higher than SGFFX's 0.60% return.
RIPIX
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- -0.94%
- 6M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 1.12%
- 1Y
- -3.41%
- 3Y*
- 2.13%
- 5Y*
- -4.60%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.09%
SGFFX
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- -1.35%
- 6M
- 2.59%
- YTD
- 0.60%
- 1Y
- 7.00%
- 3Y*
- 17.21%
- 5Y*
- 5.06%
- 10Y*
- 15.54%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.85%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
SGFFX Sparrow Growth Fund | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
RIPIX vs. SGFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIPIX Royce International Premier Fund Institutional Class | 1.12% | 9.89% | -7.04% | 8.14% | -26.99% | 6.22% | 16.11% | 34.69% | -12.52% |
SGFFX Sparrow Growth Fund | 0.60% | 14.31% | 34.81% | 17.02% | -23.36% | -11.00% | 97.83% | 27.24% | -10.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between RIPIX and SGFFX is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2018 | 0.52 |
The correlation between RIPIX and SGFFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RIPIX vs. SGFFX — Risk / Return Rank
RIPIX
SGFFX
RIPIX vs. SGFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royce International Premier Fund Institutional Class (RIPIX) and Sparrow Growth Fund (SGFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RIPIX | SGFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.07 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | 0.34 | -0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.54 | 1.10 | -1.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RIPIX vs. SGFFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIPIX drawdown since its inception was -41.89%, smaller than the maximum SGFFX drawdown of -62.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIPIX and SGFFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RIPIX | SGFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.89% | -62.10% | +20.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.33% | -15.33% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.28% | -39.29% | +22.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.89% | -40.24% | -1.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.47% | -18.29% | -7.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.16% | -22.14% | +3.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.22% | 4.76% | +1.46% |
Volatility
RIPIX vs. SGFFX - Volatility Comparison
Royce International Premier Fund Institutional Class (RIPIX) has a higher volatility of 4.63% compared to Sparrow Growth Fund (SGFFX) at 4.16%. This indicates that RIPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RIPIX | SGFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.63% | 4.16% | +0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.55% | 11.11% | +0.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.79% | 13.92% | -0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.54% | 26.97% | -11.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.12% | 28.01% | -11.89% |
RIPIX vs. SGFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RIPIX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SGFFX's 1.81% expense ratio.
Dividends
RIPIX vs. SGFFX - Dividend Comparison
RIPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, while SGFFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIPIX Royce International Premier Fund Institutional Class | 1.44% | 1.46% | 5.66% | 3.09% | 3.87% | 5.02% | 0.36% | 0.58% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SGFFX Sparrow Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 18.67% | 0.00% | 0.67% | 1.33% | 5.84% | 7.33% | 0.00% | 2.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RIPIX and SGFFX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RIPIX has higher volatility (4.63%) compared to SGFFX (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIPIX dropped -41.89% vs SGFFX's -62.10%.
SGFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.38 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RIPIX and SGFFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer