PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RIO.L vs. AGNC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RIO.L vs. AGNC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Rio Tinto PLC (RIO.L) and AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

RIO.L is traded in GBp, while AGNC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AGNC values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIO.L achieves a 26.74% return, which is significantly higher than AGNC's 4.39% return. Over the past 10 years, RIO.L has outperformed AGNC with an annualized return of 21.95%, while AGNC has yielded a comparatively lower 7.46% annualized return.


RIO.L

1D
-2.57%
1M
-3.22%
YTD
26.74%
6M
30.12%
1Y
87.98%
3Y*
19.94%
5Y*
13.51%
10Y*
21.95%

AGNC

1D
1.38%
1M
4.19%
YTD
4.39%
6M
5.38%
1Y
31.06%
3Y*
15.40%
5Y*
5.16%
10Y*
7.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIO.L vs. AGNC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RIO.L
Rio Tinto PLC
26.74%34.77%-13.38%6.96%32.01%0.26%30.37%28.27%0.31%31.42%
AGNC
AGNC Investment Corp.
4.39%25.31%10.80%4.63%-12.34%6.19%-4.67%9.00%3.32%13.03%

Correlation

The correlation between RIO.L and AGNC is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2008

0.09

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RIO.L:

£121.15B

AGNC:

$11.65B

EPS

RIO.L:

$13.15

AGNC:

$1.33

PE Ratio

RIO.L:

7.44

AGNC:

7.80

PS Ratio

RIO.L:

1.44

AGNC:

4.79

PB Ratio

RIO.L:

2.58

AGNC:

1.14

Total Revenue (TTM)

RIO.L:

$111.44B

AGNC:

$2.33B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RIO.L:

$45.93B

AGNC:

$2.30B

EBITDA (TTM)

RIO.L:

$44.33B

AGNC:

$3.72B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RIO.L vs. AGNC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIO.L
RIO.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
RIO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
RIO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

AGNC
AGNC Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
AGNC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGNC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGNC Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
AGNC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGNC Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIO.L vs. AGNC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rio Tinto PLC (RIO.L) and AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RIO.LAGNCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.29

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.25

1.91

+4.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.43

5.45

+17.98

RIO.L vs. AGNC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIO.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.40, which is higher than the AGNC Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIO.L and AGNC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RIO.L vs. AGNC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIO.L drawdown since its inception was -85.07%, which is greater than AGNC's maximum drawdown of -48.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIO.L and AGNC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RIO.LAGNCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.07%

-48.65%

-36.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.99%

-16.36%

+2.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.61%

-28.89%

+4.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.63%

-38.91%

+12.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.65%

-48.65%

+13.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.00%

-6.87%

-4.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.53%

-12.25%

-7.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.74%

5.72%

-1.98%

Volatility

RIO.L vs. AGNC - Volatility Comparison

Rio Tinto PLC (RIO.L) has a higher volatility of 8.95% compared to AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC) at 4.82%. This indicates that RIO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGNC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RIO.LAGNCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.95%

4.82%

+4.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.82%

14.97%

+6.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.91%

18.33%

+7.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.47%

24.54%

+1.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.43%

25.05%

+3.38%

Dividends

RIO.L vs. AGNC - Dividend Comparison

RIO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%, less than AGNC's 13.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGNC
AGNC Investment Corp.
13.87%13.43%15.64%14.68%13.91%9.57%10.00%11.31%12.31%10.70%12.69%14.30%
RIO.L
Rio Tinto PLC
4.06%4.75%7.16%5.53%9.90%14.14%5.43%5.76%6.07%4.66%3.42%7.42%

Financials

RIO.L vs. AGNC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rio Tinto PLC and AGNC Investment Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B202120222023202420252026
30.91B
0
(RIO.L) Total Revenue
(AGNC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


RIO.L and AGNC have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RIO.L and AGNC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer