PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RINYX vs. REBYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RINYX vs. REBYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments International Developed Markets Fund (RINYX) and Russell Investments U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (REBYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RINYX achieves a 6.75% return, which is significantly lower than REBYX's 16.13% return. Over the past 10 years, RINYX has underperformed REBYX with an annualized return of 8.35%, while REBYX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.26% annualized return.


RINYX

1D
-0.64%
1M
2.23%
YTD
6.75%
6M
8.67%
1Y
17.89%
3Y*
14.82%
5Y*
6.87%
10Y*
8.35%

REBYX

1D
-0.93%
1M
0.99%
YTD
16.13%
6M
15.52%
1Y
35.19%
3Y*
14.76%
5Y*
5.99%
10Y*
9.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RINYX vs. REBYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RINYX
Russell Investments International Developed Markets Fund
6.75%28.76%2.93%16.47%-13.16%12.88%5.91%20.11%-15.25%25.22%
REBYX
Russell Investments U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund
16.13%8.86%8.16%13.81%-16.14%26.28%13.04%23.74%-12.22%2.12%

Correlation

The correlation between RINYX and REBYX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001

0.68

The correlation between RINYX and REBYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RINYX vs. REBYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RINYX
RINYX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
RINYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RINYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
RINYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
RINYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
RINYX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

REBYX
REBYX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
REBYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REBYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
REBYX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
REBYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
REBYX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RINYX vs. REBYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments International Developed Markets Fund (RINYX) and Russell Investments U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (REBYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RINYXREBYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.34

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

3.83

-2.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.29

13.24

-6.96

RINYX vs. REBYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RINYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the REBYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RINYX and REBYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RINYXREBYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

1.97

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.26

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.39

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.33

-0.06

Drawdowns

RINYX vs. REBYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RINYX drawdown since its inception was -61.67%, roughly equal to the maximum REBYX drawdown of -62.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RINYX and REBYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RINYXREBYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.67%

-62.03%

+0.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.97%

-9.16%

-1.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.49%

-32.68%

+19.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.04%

-32.68%

+3.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.46%

-44.79%

+5.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-1.16%

+0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.82%

-11.17%

-3.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.94%

2.65%

+0.29%

Volatility

RINYX vs. REBYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Russell Investments International Developed Markets Fund (RINYX) is 3.91%, while Russell Investments U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (REBYX) has a volatility of 5.04%. This indicates that RINYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REBYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RINYXREBYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.91%

5.04%

-1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.82%

12.44%

-1.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.42%

17.87%

-4.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.34%

22.77%

-7.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.28%

23.52%

-7.24%

RINYX vs. REBYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RINYX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than REBYX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

RINYX vs. REBYX - Dividend Comparison

RINYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.89%, less than REBYX's 7.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
REBYX
Russell Investments U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund
7.13%8.28%13.03%2.64%5.30%31.12%0.64%4.46%18.61%0.33%0.88%8.23%
RINYX
Russell Investments International Developed Markets Fund
6.89%7.35%3.64%2.35%1.45%3.58%1.26%3.15%8.95%2.07%2.55%1.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


RINYX and REBYX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REBYX has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to RINYX (3.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RINYX dropped -61.67% vs REBYX's -62.03%.

REBYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RINYX and REBYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer